Abstract
Twelve amnesics with various aetiologies were compares with 12 matched control subjects on a task which examined the increase in reading speed for lists of words and pronounceable non-words that were shown several times and read twice during a training phase. After a four minute delay the reading speed for the primed lists was compared with that for an equal number of unprimed lists. No non-specific practice effects were observed. The amnesics showed an equal proportional increase in reading speed for primed words list to that of their controls, and, if anything, a slightly greater reading speed increase for non-words. These effects were found even when an amnesic subgroup, selected because its baseline reading speed was closely matched to that of the controls, was used for the comparison. The patients' preserved priming for the novel information found in the non-word list reading task occurred in conjunction with very impaired free recall for the contents of the lists. The effects occurred in patients of all aetiologies used in the study and confirm and extend the findings of Moscovitch, Winocur and McLachlan (1986).
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.