Abstract

Key features of laboratory projects that allow for authentic use of writing include student agency, longer timescale, and lack of a predetermined outcome.

Highlights

  • Writing plays a key role in the process of science, and as such is identified as an important skill that students should develop throughout their undergraduate physics curriculum [1]

  • The different modes of writing goal refers to wanting students be able to write about experimental physics in multiple contexts, highlighting modes of written communication that are central to the process of science

  • The course we investigate for this case study is a 10-week advanced lab course typically taken by senior physics majors; it is offered in both the winter and spring quarters, and has a maximum capacity of 12 students per term

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Writing plays a key role in the process of science, and as such is identified as an important skill that students should develop throughout their undergraduate physics curriculum [1]. The framework defines fifteen possible goals instructors might have for writing in labs, organized into five overlapping categories—communication, writing as professionalization (WAP), writing to learn (WTL), course logistics, and social emotional. We use this framework as a lens through which to view three different advanced lab courses that include student-designed projects. Multiweek student-designed projects are growing in popularity in lab courses [13] Such projects have unique affordances when it comes to students’ learning, including the possibility to engage in authentic communication practices [1,13]. The goals of this paper are the following: (a) present an indepth description of possible implementations of writing as a key element of student-designed projects, (b) demonstrate how the framework of possible goals for writing in lab classes [5] can be used for research, and (c) discuss the unique affordances of student-designed projects for writing

FRAMEWORK
Communication
Course logistics
Social emotional
Case study approach
Data sources
Methods of analysis
CASE DESCRIPTIONS
Case 1
Case 2
Case 3
ANALYSIS
Cohesive narrative
Different modes of communication
Argumentation
Professional norms
Writing as a practice needed for technical professions
Engaging with scientific literature
Nature of science
Reflection
Synthesis
Facilitating the project
Grading
Affect
Agency
Identity
AFFORDANCES OF PROJECTS
LIMITATIONS
Findings
VIII. CONCLUSIONS
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.