Abstract

Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) has become a widely used atomic spectroscopic technique for rapid coal analysis. However, the vast amount of spectral information in LIBS contains signal uncertainty, which can affect its quantification performance. In this work, we propose a hybrid variable selection method to improve the performance of LIBS quantification. Important variables are first identified using Pearson’s correlation coefficient, mutual information, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and random forest, and then filtered and combined with empirical variables related to fingerprint elements of coal ash content. Subsequently, these variables are fed into a partial least squares regression (PLSR). Additionally, in some models, certain variables unrelated to ash content are removed manually to study the impact of variable deselection on model performance. The proposed hybrid strategy was tested on three LIBS datasets for quantitative analysis of coal ash content and compared with the corresponding data-driven baseline method. It is significantly better than the variable selection only method based on empirical knowledge and in most cases outperforms the baseline method. The results showed that on all three datasets the hybrid strategy for variable selection combining empirical knowledge and data-driven algorithms achieved the lowest root mean square error of prediction (RMSEP) values of 1.605, 3.478 and 1.647, respectively, which were significantly lower than those obtained from multiple linear regression using only 12 empirical variables, which are 1.959, 3.718 and 2.181, respectively. The LASSO-PLSR model with empirical support and 20 selected variables exhibited a significantly improved performance after variable deselection, with RMSEP values dropping from 1.635, 3.962 and 1.647 to 1.483, 3.086 and 1.567, respectively. Such results demonstrate that using empirical knowledge as a support for data-driven variable selection can be a viable approach to improve the accuracy and reliability of LIBS quantification.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.