Abstract

Simulation is used to evaluate the future performance of water supply headworks systems. Typically, most of the uncertainties associated with the use of demand models are ignored in the simulation. A simulation methodology is presented which makes allowance for the uncertainties associated with the use of demand and streamflow models. The demand uncertainties considered are natural, climatic, socioeconomic, and model parameter uncertainty. The methodology is illustrated using two case studies which consider a simple stationary demand model and the widely used trend extrapolation demand model. The results show that ignoring demand uncertainties (as well as streamflow model parameter uncertainty) can significantly bias the expected reliability. This bias depends on the magnitude of demand uncertainty which in turn depends on model structure, length of data available for calibration, and uncertainty in future socioeconomic variables. Moreover, this bias tends to increase as streamflow variability decreases. To guard against overoptimistic assessment of system performance, it is suggested that allowance be made for demand uncertainty (as well as streamflow model parameter uncertainty) in headworks simulation.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.