Incisional Hernia after Robotic Urological Surgery.

Background: Although several risk factors for incisional hernia after hepatectomy have been reported, their relationship to different wound sites has not been investigated. Therefore, this study aimed to examine the risk factors for incisional hernia according to various wound sites after hepatectomy.Methods: Patients from the Osaka Liver Surgery Study Group who underwent open hepatectomy using combinations of vertical and horizontal incisions (J‐shaped incision, reversed L‐shaped incision, reversed T‐shaped incision, Mercedes incision) between January 2012 and December 2015 were included. Incisional hernia was defined as a hernia occurring within 3 y after surgery. Abdominal incisional hernia was classified into midline incisional hernia and transverse incisional hernia. The risk factors for each posthepatectomy incisional hernia type were identified.Results: A total of 1057 patients met the inclusion criteria. The overall posthepatectomy incisional hernia incidence rate was 5.9% (62 patients). In the multivariate analysis, the presence of diabetes mellitus and albumin levels <3.5 g/dL were identified as independent risk factors. Moreover, incidence rates of midline and transverse incisional hernias were 2.4% (25 patients), and 2.3% (24 patients), respectively. In multivariate analysis, the independent risk factor for transverse incisional hernia was the occurrence of superficial or deep incisional surgical site infection, and interrupted suturing for midline incisional hernia.Conclusions: Risk factors for incisional hernia after hepatectomy depend on the wound site. To prevent incisional hernia, running suture use might be better for midline wound closure. The prevention of postoperative wound infection is important for transverse wounds, under the presumption of preoperative nutrition and normoglycemia.

Incisional hernia occurs in up to 20% of patients after abdominal surgery and is most common after vertical midline incisions. Diastasis recti may contribute to incisional hernia but has not been explored as a risk factor or included in hernia risk models. We examined the association between diastasis recti and incisional hernia after midline incisions. In this single-center study, all patients undergoing elective gastrointestinal surgery with a midline open incision or extraction site in a prospective surgical quality collaborative database between 2016 and 2020 were included. Eligible patients had axial imaging within 6months prior to surgery and no less than 6months after surgery to determine the presence of diastasis recti and incisional hernia, respectively. Radiographic hernia-free survival was assessed with log-rank tests and multivariable Cox regression, comparing patients with and without diastasis width > 25mm. Of 156 patients, forty-four (28.2%) developed radiographic hernia > 1cm. 36 of 85 patients (42.4%) with DR width > 25mm developed IH, compared to 9 of 71 (12.7%) without DR (p < 0.001). Hernia-free survival differed by DR width on bivariate and multivariable Cox regression, adjusted hazard ratio: 3.87, 95% confidence interval: 1.84-8.14. Diastasis recti is a significant risk factor for incisional hernia after midline abdominal surgery. When present, surgeons can include these data when discussing surgical risks and should consider a lower risk, off-midline approach when feasible. Incorporating diastasis into larger studies may improve comprehensive models of incisional hernia risk.

Umbilical midline incisions for single incision- or reduced port laparoscopic surgery are still discussed controversially because of a higher rate of incisional hernia compared to conventional laparoscopic techniques. The aim of this study was to evaluate incidence and risk factors for incisional hernia after reduced port colorectal surgery. A total 241 patients underwent elective reduced port colorectal surgery between 2014 and 2020. Follow-up was achieved through telephone interview or clinical examination. The study collective was examined using univariate and multivariate analysis. A total of 150 patients with complete follow-up were included into this study. Mean follow-up time was 36 (IQR 24-50) months. The study collective consists of 77 (51.3%) female and 73 (48.7%) male patients with an average BMI of 26kg/m2 (IQR 23-28) and an average age of 61 (± 14). Indication for surgery was diverticulitis in 55 (36.6%) cases, colorectal cancer in 65 (43.3%) patients, and other benign reasons in 30 (20.0%) cases. An incisional hernia was observed 9 times (6.0%). Obesity (OR 5.8, 95% CI 1.5-23.1, p = 0.02) and pre-existent umbilical hernia (OR 161.0, 95% CI 23.1-1124.5, p < 0.01) were significant risk factors for incisional hernia in the univariate analysis. Furthermore, pre-existent hernia is shown to be a risk factor also in multivariate analysis. We could demonstrate that reduced port colorectal surgery using an umbilical single port access is feasible and safe with a low rate of incisional hernia. Obesity and pre-existing umbilical hernia are significant risk factors for incisional hernia.

To review the veterinary literature regarding healing and complications associated with equine celiotomy including anatomy and physiology, risk factors for incisional infection and hernia, and treatment. Celiotomy is the most common approach to treat horses with surgical colic. Incision through the linea alba provides exposure to most of the abdomen for exploration, exteriorization, and correction of surgical lesions. Incisional apposition relies on suture strength during anesthetic recovery and for the first 30 days postoperatively. Factors associated with the patient, surgical lesion and procedures, anesthesia, and recovery put the horse at risk for surgical site infection. Infection is the most important risk factor for incisional hernia formation. A presumptive diagnosis of surgical site infection is made based on the presence of fever and incisional swelling, pain, and discharge. Ultrasonography can be used to identify areas of fluid accumulation prior to the appearance of incisional drainage. Definitive diagnosis is based on positive bacteriologic culture of the incisional discharge. Incisional hernia is diagnosed by palpation of the incision, usually 30-60 days after surgery. Ultrasound of the incision may aide in early diagnosis of incisional hernia if gaps along the incision in the linea alba are apparent. No objective data exist to assess the efficacy of specific therapies for surgical site infections following celiotomy. Principles of treatment include the establishment of drainage, bandaging, antimicrobial therapy based on culture and sensitivity, and extended rest in an attempt to avoid incisional hernia or dehiscence. Treatment for incisional hernia includes prolonged circumferential bandaging, open or minimally invasive hernia repair, or no treatment. Incisional complications are associated with prolonged convalescence and diminished prognosis for return to athleticism. Limiting risk factors for surgical site infections, prompt treatment, and incisional support may optimize celiotomy healing and timely return to function. Horses compete in many disciplines with incisional hernias.

BackgroundPrevention of incisional hernias with a prophylactic mesh in emergency surgery is controversial. The present study aimed to analyze the long-term results of prophylactic mesh used for preventing incisional hernia after emergency midline laparotomies.MethodsThis study was a registered (NCT04578561) retrospective analysis of patients who underwent an emergency midline laparotomy between January 2009 and July 2010 with a follow-up period of longer than 2 years. Long-term outcomes and risk factors for the development of incisional hernias between patients who received a prophylactic reinforcement mesh (Group M) and suture (Group S) were compared.ResultsFrom an initial 266 emergency midline laparotomies, 187 patients were included. The median follow-up time was 64.4 months (SD 35). Both groups had similar characteristics, except for a higher rate of previous operations (62 vs. 43.2%; P = 0.01) and operation due to a revision laparotomy (32.5 vs.13%; P = 0.02) in the M group. During follow-up, 29.9% of patients developed an incisional hernia (Group S 36.6% vs. Group M 14.3%; P = 0.002). Chronic mesh infections were diagnosed in 2 patients, but no mesh explants were needed, and no patient in the M group developed chronic pain. Long-term risk factors for incisional hernia were as follows: smoking (HR = 2.47; 95% CI 1.318–4.624; P = 0.05), contaminated surgery (HR = 2.98; 95% CI 1.142–7.8; P = 0.02), surgical site infection (SSI; HR = 3.83; 95% CI 1.86–7.86; P = 0.001), and no use of prophylactic mesh (HR = 5.09; 95% CI 2.1–12.2; P = 0.001).ConclusionIncidence of incisional hernias after emergency midline laparotomies is high and increases with time. High-risk patients, contaminated surgery, and surgical site infection (SSI) benefit from mesh reinforcement. Prophylactic mesh use is safe and feasible in emergencies with a low long-term complication rate.Trial registration: NCT04578561. www.clinicaltrials.gov

BackgroundSeveral factors and patient characteristics influence the risk of surgical wound dehiscence and incisional hernia after midline laparotomy. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether a specified, or not specified, suture quota in the operative report affects the incidence of surgical wound complications and to describe the previously known risk factors for these complications.MethodsRetrospective data collection from medical records of all vascular procedures and laparotomies engaging the small intestines, colon and rectum performed in 2010. Patients were enrolled from four hospitals in the region Västra Götaland, Sweden. Unadjusted and adjusted Cox regression analyses were used when calculating the impact of the risk factors for surgical wound dehiscence and incisional hernia.ResultsA total of 1,621 patients were included in the study. Wound infection was a risk factor for both wound dehiscence and incisional hernia. BMI 25–30, 30–35 and >35 were risk factors for wound dehiscence and BMI 30–35 was a risk factor for incisional hernia. We did not find that documentation of the details of suture technique, regarding wound and suture length, influenced the rate of wound dehiscence or incisional hernia.ConclusionsThese results support previous findings identifying wound infection and high BMI as risk factors for both wound dehiscence and incisional hernia. Our study indicates the importance of preventive measures against wound infection and a preoperative dietary regiment could be considered as a routine worth testing for patients with high BMI planned for abdominal surgical precedures.

Comprehensive evaluation of surgical procedures remains the cornerstone of quality control. Robotic surgery has become a popular surgical option in urology. We review the English medical literature on urological robot-assisted endoscopic surgery (URAES) in order to assess the trends of medical publications regarding this subject. All Studies addressing URAES were included. Information for this review was obtained by Pub Med searches from 2003 to 2008. Keywords used in our search included: "robotic urologic surgery", "robotic assisted urological surgery". Only articles published in English were included in this review. We identified 383 studies. 366 articles corresponded to clinical series of different topics regarding robotics in urology; 13 articles presented comparisons of robotic surgery versus either pure laparoscopic or open surgery in urological procedures such as radical cistectomy (1), radical prostatectomy (10) and pyeloplasty (2). Four studies corresponded to randomized control trials, addressing robotic telerounding (2), kidney percutaneous access (1) and camera holding devices for endoscopic surgery (1). URAES is an emerging surgical option for urological operations like radical prostatectomy, pyeloplasty and radical cystectomy. There is lack of high-level evidence information to support the idea of robotic surgery as the upcoming surgical gold standard in urology. Surgical evolution will favour the potential benefits of robotic technology, but there is need for design and performance of prospective randomized trials in robotic urologic surgery in order to consolidate the application of this novel technology.

The growth of computer-assisted (robotic) surgery in urology 2000–2014: The role of Asian surgeons

ObjectiveIncisional hernias are a common complication of midline laparotomies. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of prophylactic mesh placement after midline laparotomy for ovarian tumors on...

Evaluation of the Effect of Closure Technique on Incidence of Incisional Hernia after Single-Port Laparoscopy in Gynecologic Oncology Surgery

Background and Objectives: Incisional hernias are a common and costly complication of surgery, occurring in up to 20% of midline incisions within 3 years of initial operation. Risk factors for incisional hernia include incision site, fascial closure technique, body mass index (BMI), surgical site infections, and gastrointestinal surgery. Limited studies have compared procedural type as a risk factor for hernia formation. The goal of this study was to examine incisional hernia rates among general surgical and gynecologic procedures. Materials and Methods: We queried our Research Data Warehouse for inpatients who had undergone common open abdominal surgeries between January 2012 and December 2022. Patients' index operations were identified based upon Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes and presence of a postoperative incisional hernia was determined by occurrence of an incisional hernia ICD10 diagnosis code more than 2 weeks postoperatively. The main study outcome was time to incisional hernia diagnosis. Results: A total of 4447 patients were identified. Postoperatively, 241 (5.4%) patients were diagnosed with incisional hernias. Hernia rates at 1, 3 and 5 years were 3% (SE 0.003), 6% (0.004) and 8% (0.005), respectively. Patients undergoing exploratory laparotomy (hazard ratio 3.9, p < 0.001), bowel resection (HR 5.5, p < 0.001), and primary hernia repair (HR 13.0, p < 0.001) were found to have significantly increased risk for incisional hernia development compared to those undergoing hysterectomy, following adjustment for comorbid risks, age, sex, and BMI. Conclusions: Exploratory laparotomy, bowel resection, and primary ventral hernia repair are associated with a higher incidence of incisional hernia relative to gynecologic procedures. This relatively unstudied comparison warrants further investigation.

Incisional hernia after liver transplantation is a common complication with an incidence between 5% and 34%. This prospective study analyzed risk factors, surgical management and long-term results after hernia repair. From February 2002 until August 2009, 810 liver transplantations were performed. 77 patients (9.5%) underwent incisional hernia repair after a median time of 21.1 months (4.6-76.7) following transplant. These patients were compared to patients without hernia (n=733). No statistically significant differences between the groups were observed with respect to gender, underlying liver disease, Child-Pugh classification, MELD-Score and preoperative renal failure (p=NS). Multivariate analysis revealed advanced age (p=0.014), body mass index (p=0.016), and re-laparotomies (p<0.001) as independent risk factors for incisional hernias. Pre-existing diabetes mellitus and immunosuppression with mycophenolate mofetil reached significance only in the univariate analysis (p<0.001). Recurrent hernia was observed in 12 of 77 patients (15.6%) at a median time of 7.9 months (4.8-46.8) after primary surgical repair. The recurrence rate after intraperitoneal onlay mesh implantation was lower compared to other mesh techniques (7.7% vs. 21.4%). The risk factors for the development of incisional hernias in liver transplant patients are similar to patients with prior abdominal surgery for other reasons. Intraperitoneal onlay mesh implantation may lead to a decrease of hernia recurrences. The role of immunosuppression in the genesis of incisional hernias requires further elucidation.

Introduction/BackgroundIncisional hernias are a frequent complication of midline laparotomies in abdominal surgery. This study was conducted in order to determine the efficacy and safety of mesh placement in reducing incisional...

BackgroundIncisional hernias are a common complication of emergency laparotomy and are associated with significant morbidity. Recent studies have found a reduction in incisional hernias when mesh is placed prophylactically during abdominal closure in elective laparotomies. This systematic review will assess the safety and efficacy of prophylactic mesh placement in emergency laparotomy.MethodsA systematic review was performed according to the PROSPERO registered protocol (CRD42018109283). Papers were dual screened for eligibility, and included when a comparison was made between closure with prophylactic mesh and closure with a standard technique, reported using a comparative design (i.e. case–control, cohort or randomised trial), where the primary outcome was incisional hernia. Bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias in non-randomised studies tool. A meta-analysis of incisional hernia rate was performed to estimate risk ratio using a random effects model (Mantel–Haenszel approach).Results332 studies were screened for eligibility, 29 full texts were reviewed and 2 non-randomised studies were included. Both studies were biased due to confounding factors, as closure technique was based on patient risk factors for incisional hernia. Both studies found significantly fewer incisional hernias in the mesh groups [3.2% vs 28.6% (p < 0.001) and 5.9% vs 33.3% (p = 0.0001)]. A meta-analysis of incisional hernia risk favoured prophylactic mesh closure [risk ratio 0.15 (95% CI 0.6–0.35, p < 0.001)]. Neither study found an association between mesh and infection or enterocutaneous fistula.ConclusionThis review found that there are limited data to assess the effect or safety profile of prophylactic mesh in the emergency laparotomy setting. The current data cannot reliably assess the use of mesh due to confounding factors, and a randomised controlled trial is required to address this important clinical question.

Incisional hernia in the elderly: Risk factors and clinical considerations