Abstract

Community supported agriculture (CSA) programs are emerging as popular consumer options for pro­duce acquisition. While many researchers have dis­cussed the impacts of CSA on economies, commu­nities, and the environment, others are interested in documenting how produce-based CSA shapes health. In this paper, we evaluate whether and to what extent CSA incentive programs, funded by diverse employer groups in central Kentucky 2015–2018, impact shareholder wellness. To evaluate impact, we use two distinct types of data: we com­pare shareholders’ perceived frequency of food lifestyle behaviors from pre- and post-season sur­veys, and we examine anonymized medical claims from a subset of these participants to determine if CSA participation impacts short-run usage of medical services. From survey data, we observed statistically significant changes in some shareholder behaviors. For instance, CSA shareholders per­ceived that they consumed vegetable salads more often while decreasing their intake of processed foods and snacks. From medical claims data, share­holders are billed less in diet-related medical claims following CSA participation compared to a control group from the same employer organization. In short, we find that CSA is generally beneficial and participants view their experience as providing motivation to reshape their relationship to food. We conclude by offering strategies for institutions and organizations to effectively develop and support CSA incentive programs.

Highlights

  • Background of Central Kentucky Community supported agriculture (CSA) VoucherProject We developed a pilot study at the University of Kentucky in 2015 to examine the potential impacts of CSA on first-time shareholders

  • Results and Analysis for Medical Claims Costs Analysis While measuring behavior changes in CSA is important, whether these perceived changes translate into biophysical impacts is an open question

  • We evaluated whether changes in billed medical claims differ in magnitude when comparing CSA shareholders to non-participants from the same employee pool

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Project We developed a pilot study at the University of Kentucky in 2015 to examine the potential impacts of CSA on first-time shareholders. We offered a $200 voucher to individuals who had never participated in a CSA. Participants were given a pre- and post-season survey in which they evaluated 30+ metrics of behavior. We observed significant behavior changes across numerous indicators, especially for individuals who rated their health at or below average at the outset of participation (Rossi et al, 2017). We presented our results to the benefits office at our university, and they agreed to fund ~200 more vouchers in 2016 as a pilot employee benefit program. We again evaluated behavior changes with a similar pre- and postseason survey

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.