Abstract
Because each of the agent's multitasks can have several measures, the multitask agency theory predicts that incentive devices based on these measures can be complements or substitutes. However, the existing empirical literature on multitask agency considers only complementarity. This paper investigates both complementarity and substitutability of measures of CEO compensation theoretically and empirically. Using a panel data set of CEO contracts from more than 300 Chinese state-owned enterprises, we find empirical evidence that profits are not the only objective of the Chinese government in designing CEO contracts. Our findings about the determinants of incentive devices in China support predictions of the agency theory and the incomplete contracts theory. Journal of Comparative Economics 33 (3) (2005) 517–539.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
