Abstract

The objectives of this study were: 1) to compare the effects of live yeast (LY), yeast fermentation product (YFP), a mix of Lactobacillus acidophilus and Propionibacterium freudenreichii (MLP), and Lactobacillus plantarum included as additives in dairy cows’ diets on in vitro ruminal fermentation and gas production (GP); and 2) to evaluate the effects of L. plantarum as direct-fed microbials (DFM) in dairy cows’ diets on in vitro ruminal fermentation, GP, nutrient digestibility, and N metabolism. Three experiments were carried out: Exp. 1 had the objective to compare all additives regarding ruminal fermentation parameters: an Ankom GP system was used in a completely randomized design, consisting of four 48 h incubations, and eight replications per treatment. There were eight treatments: a basal diet without additive (CTRL) or with one of the following additives: LY, YFP, MLP, or L. plantarum at four levels (% of diet Dry Matter (DM)): 0.05% (L1), 0.10% (L2), 0.15% (L3), and 0.20% (L4). In Exp. 2, a batch culture was used to evaluate ruminal fermentation, and CO2 and CH4 production using the same treatments and a similar experimental design, except for having 16 replications per treatment. Based on Exp. 1 and 2 results, Exp. 3 aimed at evaluating the effects of the L. plantarum on ruminal true nutrient digestibility and N utilization in order to evaluate the use of L. plantarum as DFM. The treatments CTRL, MLP, L1, and L2 were used in a replicated 4 × 4 Latin square design using a dual-flow continuous culture system. Data were analyzed using linear and nonlinear regression; treatment means were compared through contrasts, and L treatments in Exp. 1 and 2 were tested for linear, quadratic, and cubic effects. In Exp. 1, all treatments containing additives tended to reduce OM digestibility as well as reduced total volatile fatty acids (VFA) concentration and total GP. The YFP had greater OM digestibility than LY, and MLP treatment had greater total VFA concentration compared to L. plantarum treatments. In Exp. 2, additives reduced CO2 production, and there were no major differences in CH4. In Exp. 3, all additives reduced NH3-N concentration. In conclusion, pH and lactate concentration were not affected in all three experiments regardless of additive tested, suggesting that these additives may not improve ruminal fermentation by pH modulation; and L. plantarum may improve ruminal N metabolism when used as DFM in high-producing dairy cows’ diets, mainly by reducing NH3-N concentration.

Highlights

  • Direct fed microbials (DFM) are live microbial additives that have been fed to high-producing dairy cows to modulate ruminal fermentation in order to enhance milk production (McAllister et al, 2011)

  • There was a trend for additive inclusion to reduce the fermentation rate (P = 0.10) and Organic Matter (OM) digestibility (P = 0.10), while total GP at 24 h (P = 0.04) and 48 h (P = 0.02) of incubation were reduced by additive inclusion compared to the control treatment without additive (CTRL) treatment (Table 3)

  • One possible reason for these negative effects in a short-term incubation may be due to a disruption in the ruminal microbial ecosystem, possibly causing reduction in cross-feeding, which is an important characteristic of the ruminal microbial ecosystem (Russell, 2002)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Direct fed microbials (DFM) are live microbial additives that have been fed to high-producing dairy cows to modulate ruminal fermentation in order to enhance milk production (McAllister et al, 2011). Live yeast (LY) were one of the first DFM used for high-producing dairy cows because they are aerobic microorganisms that may improve ruminal anaerobiosis through oxygen scavenging and may metabolize ruminal lactate (McAllister et al, 2011). As an alternative to LY, yeast fermentation product (YFP) containing yeast bioactive compounds and culture media, yet not viable yeast, has recently been used as additives for high-producing dairy cows because it has shown more consistency in its effects. Robinson and Erasmus (2009), summarized studies with YFP supplementation, and showed increases in milk production; some studies did not find positive responses when YFP was fed to high-producing dairy cows (Hristov et al, 2010; Leicester et al, 2016)

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.