Abstract

We investigated the in vitro efficacy of combinations of carbapenems with clindamycin (CLDM) and minocycline (MINO) against Bacteroides fragilis and Peptostreptococcus species. We selected the carbapenems imipenem, meropenem, panipenem, doripenem, and biapenem. To evaluate the antibiotic efficacy of these combination regimens, the fractional inhibitory concentration index (FICI) was calculated against clinical isolates. Consequently, combination regimens of each carbapenem with CLDM or MINO showed synergistic or additive effects against 83.3–100.0% and no antagonistic effects against P. anaerobius isolates. However, against the B. fragilis group (B. fragilis, B. thetaiotaomicron, and Parabacteroides distasonis), although the combination with other carbapenems and CLDM or MINO did not show remarkable synergistic effects, the combination regimen of IPM with CLDM or MINO indicated mainly additive antibiotic efficacies (FICIs: >0.5 to ≤1.0) to B. fragilis groups. Then, antagonistic effects were admitted in only 5.6% of B. fragilis groups. The effectiveness of antibiotic combination therapy against pathogenic anaerobes has remained unclear. Then, our results can provide new insights to explore the effective combination regimens against multidrug-resistant anaerobic bacteria as empirical and definitive therapies, while this study used only carbapenem susceptible isolates. Hence, further studies are needed to use highly antibiotic-resistant anaerobic isolates to carbapenems.

Highlights

  • The overall number of immunocompromised patients with various disease types has been increasing in recent years with highly advanced medical treatments. This phenomenon resulted in an increase in the number of anaerobic bacteria isolated from patients, especially

  • Several reports have indicated that multidrug-resistant anaerobic bacteria were detected among clinical isolates [12,13,14]

  • This study evaluated the antibiotic activities of combination regimens, including carbapenems (IPM, MEPM, DRPM, BIPM, and PAPM)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. The overall number of immunocompromised patients with various disease types has been increasing in recent years with highly advanced medical treatments. This phenomenon resulted in an increase in the number of anaerobic bacteria isolated from patients, especially. Immune insufficiency can cause opportunistic infections, including infections with anaerobes and, underlying diseases (e.g., hemodialysis, malignancy and diabetes) are risk factors for anaerobic bacteremia [1]. The presence of anaerobes is known to be associated with a higher rate of mortality, even in polymicrobial infections [3,4,5,6]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.