Abstract

Increasing carbapenem resistance rates worldwide underscored the urgent need of novel antimicrobials. Ceftazidime–avibactam and aztreonam–avibactam combinations are developed to combat carbapenem resistance, but biological and geographic variations must be considered for antibiotic susceptibility patterns varied. Thus, we sought to assess the susceptibilities of ceftazidime–avibactam and aztreonam–avibactam against 660 carbapenem-nonsusceptible Enterobacteriaceae isolates (472 Klebsiella pneumoniae and 188 Escherichia coli) collected during an earlier Taiwan surveillance study. Agar dilution method was used to determine ceftazidime–avibactam and aztreonam–avibactam susceptibility. Metallo-carbapenemase’s contribution to resistance were investigated with EDTA addition. The in vivo efficacies were evaluated using a Caenorhabditis elegans model. High susceptibility rates were observed for ceftazidime–avibactam and aztreonam–avibactam against the 472 carbapenem-nonsusceptible K. pneumoniae (CnsKP) (85.2% and 95.3%, respectively) and 188 carbapenem-nonsusceptible E. coli (CnsEC) isolates (91.5% and 94.1%, respectively). For non-metallo-carbapenemase producers, the susceptibility rates for ceftazidime–avibactam were 93.6% for CnsKP and 97.7% for CnsEC, whereas only 7.1% CnsKP and 11.1% CnsEC in metallo-carbapenemase producers were susceptible to ceftazidime–avibactam. Of all isolates, 95.3% CnsKP and 94.1% CnsEC were susceptible to aztreonam–avibactam. In C. elegans model, ceftazidime–avibactam and aztreonam–avibactam revealed effective against a blaKPC-producing K. pneumoniae isolate in vivo. Our results propose a positive therapeutic approach for both combinations against carbapenem-nonsusceptible Enterobacteriaceae in Taiwan.

Highlights

  • Due to the rapid dissemination of resistant genes and the over-prescription and overconsumption of carbapenems, health care professionals all over the world are facing challenges associated with carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) infections, with treatments costing billions of dollars [1]

  • A moderate level of resistance was found in gentamicin (379/660, 57%)

  • The mean log2 minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) differences and their 95% confidence intervals of ceftazidime–avibactam against K. pneumoniae isolates with Class A and Class D carbapenemases were −5.2 (−5.4, −5.0; p < 0.0001) and −4.8 (−5.7, −3.9; p < 0.0001), respectively; those of aztreonam–avibactam against K. pneumoniae isolates with Class A and Class D carbapenemases were revealed as −6.3 (−6.5, −6.2; p < 0.0001) and −6.0 (−7.2, −4.8; p < 0.0001)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Due to the rapid dissemination of resistant genes and the over-prescription and overconsumption of carbapenems, health care professionals all over the world are facing challenges associated with carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) infections, with treatments costing billions of dollars [1]. Ceftazidime-avibactam, a β-lactam-plus-β-lactamase inhibitor combination that received US FDA approval in 2015, has been described as having anti-CRE efficacy, except for metallo-beta-lactamase producers [5]. In a SIDERO-WT-2014 study, different resistance rates in North America (3.3%) and Europe (28.1%) were observed for ceftazidime–avibactam in meropenem-nonsusceptible Enterobacteriaceae [7] In another SIDERO-WT-2014 study, the authors reported that the KPC-type enzymes were the dominant carbapenemase carriage in both North America and Europe, but metallo-carbapenemases (NDM, VIM, or IMP) were mainly found in European isolates [8]. From their results of antimicrobial susceptibility testing, ceftazidime-avibactam was noted with poor activities against metallo-carbapenemase producers. Bioinformatic analyses were performed to clarify our results and to identify factors affecting susceptibility

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.