Abstract

AbstractUsing the largest household panel surveyUnderstanding Society, this paper investigates low-income dynamics among pensioner households in the UK controlling for biases due to initial conditions and non-random survey attrition. Estimation results indicate there is a correlation between initial and conditional poverty status, specifically, there is regression towards the mean. The results find no evidence of a correlation between initial poverty status, conditional poverty status and survey attrition. The findings show the importance of benefit income in determining poverty status, suggesting that a dichotomous measure such as poverty status may not suitably reflect actual pensioner living standards. Aside from benefit income, receipt of employer and occupational pension, health, education and subjective financial situation are important in determining initial and conditional poverty status. Stylised examples highlight the significant differences in the ‘poverty experience’ which arise due to differences individual and household characteristics.

Highlights

  • In the UK a significant proportion of the population (1 in 6) is aged 65 and over, in addition both birth and cohort life expectancy is increasing (ONS, 2014, 2015).1 These issues are not unique to the UK, but shared by many developed economies and have led to the number of older individuals to rise significantly over the past 50 years (OECD, 2011)

  • Using the largest household panel survey Understanding Society, this paper investigates lowincome dynamics among pensioner households in the UK controlling for biases due to initial conditions and non-random survey attrition

  • Using the largest country-specific household panel survey Understanding Society this paper provides the first estimates of low-income dynamics among British pensioner households, which account for biases which may arise due to initial conditions and non-random attrition

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In the UK a significant proportion of the population (1 in 6) is aged 65 and over, in addition both birth and cohort life expectancy is increasing (ONS, 2014, 2015). These issues are not unique to the UK, but shared by many developed economies and have led to the number of older individuals (globally) to rise significantly over the past 50 years (OECD, 2011). Understanding pensioner poverty and pensioner living standards within the context of an ageing population in the UK is an important policy issue; it has implications for advanced economies with a similar welfare system. Using the largest country-specific household panel survey Understanding Society this paper provides the first estimates of low-income dynamics among British pensioner households, which account for biases which may arise due to initial conditions and non-random attrition. The fact that social benefit income, in particular disability income, plays an important role in determining poverty transitions highlights the fact that unlike in conventional studies of poverty dynamics of the working age population, a simple dichotomous measure such as being poor or non-poor may not necessarily truly reflect a pensioners actual standard of living..

Pensioner poverty
Modelling individual-level transitions
First-order Markov model
Poverty transition probabilities
Understanding society
Variables
Model identification
Characteristics
Estimation results and sensitivity analysis
Initial poverty status
Sample retention
Conditional poverty status
Covariate effects conditional on being initially poor
Covariate effects conditional on being initially non-poor
Correlations
Model identification and sensitivity tests
Changes in income
Stylised examples
Conclusion
Findings
39. London
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.