Abstract
Social silence has been one of the poignant concepts of memory studies, although one predominantly encapsulated by “traumatic” and “denying” approaches. In contrast, this article focuses on broader daily life dynamics of narrating silence to understand mnemonic cultures. By denoting practices of silence, individuals connote underlying regulations about what can be brought to the fore or left “under the carpet.” Based on biographical narratives of members of two post-dictatorial generations in Argentina and Chile, I identify five mechanisms which produce silence among generations: fear of talking, a collective template of reconciliation, a lack of repertoires of justification, the control of symbolic boundaries, and patterns of conflict management. Finally, I claim that these mechanisms—or varieties of silence—act more efficiently in Chilean than Argentinean political culture. This might be as a result not only of opposed transitional justice paths but also of different communicative patterns historically rooted.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.