Abstract

AbstractPredictions of the impact of coronal mass ejections (CMEs) in the heliosphere mostly rely on cone CME models, whose performances are optimized for locations in the ecliptic plane and at 1 AU (e.g., at Earth). Progresses in the exploration of the inner heliosphere, however, advocate the need to assess their performances at both higher latitudes and smaller heliocentric distances. In this work, we perform 3‐D magnetohydrodynamics simulations of artificial cone CMEs using the EUropean Heliospheric FORecasting Information Asset (EUHFORIA), investigating the performances of cone models in the case of CMEs launched at high latitudes. We compare results obtained initializing CMEs using a commonly applied approximated (Euclidean) distance relation and using a proper (great circle) distance relation. Results show that initializing high‐latitude CMEs using the Euclidean approximation results in a teardrop‐shaped CME cross section at the model inner boundary that fails in reproducing the initial shape of high‐latitude cone CMEs as a circular cross section. Modeling errors arising from the use of an inappropriate distance relation at the inner boundary eventually propagate to the heliospheric domain. Errors are most prominent in simulations of high‐latitude CMEs and at the location of spacecraft at high latitudes and/or small distances from the Sun, with locations impacted by the CME flanks being the most error sensitive. This work shows that the low‐latitude approximations commonly employed in cone models, if not corrected, may significantly affect CME predictions at various locations compatible with the orbit of space missions such as Parker Solar Probe, Ulysses, and Solar Orbiter.

Highlights

  • Coronal mass ejections (CMEs) are large-scale eruptions of plasma and magnetic fields from the Sun considered to be the main source of intense space weather disturbances at Earth (Gosling, 1993; Koskinen & Huttunen, 2006)

  • Heliospheric Propagation To establish the relevance of the aforementioned modeling error to space weather applications and coronal mass ejections (CMEs) predictions in the heliosphere, we further investigate its evolution in the heliospheric domain by comparing simulations employing different distance relations

  • In this paper we have discussed the initialization of cone CMEs in 3-D MHD heliospheric models and its consequences on modeling results and space weather predictions outside of the ecliptic plane

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Coronal mass ejections (CMEs) are large-scale eruptions of plasma and magnetic fields from the Sun considered to be the main source of intense space weather disturbances at Earth (Gosling, 1993; Koskinen & Huttunen, 2006). These authors tested various possible alternative implementation approaches using the EUropean Heliospheric FORecasting Information Asset heliospheric model (EUHFORIA, Pomoell & Poedts, 2018). As the attention of the community turns to the study of new environments in the solar system (see, e.g., Guo et al, 2018; Palmerio et al, 2019; Riley et al, 2019), investigating how the approximations used in current CME models affect predictions at different locations than Earth has become a critical issue to address in order to expand our prediction horizon, in particular toward higher latitudes and lower heliocentric distances.

The EUHFORIA Model
Test Case Event
Results and Discussion
Conclusions

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.