Abstract

Rayleigh waves often propagate according to complex mode excitation so that the proper identification and separation of specific modes can be quite difficult or, in some cases, just impossible. Furthermore, the analysis of a single component (i.e., an inversion procedure based on just one objective function) necessarily prevents solving the problems related to the non-uniqueness of the solution. To overcome these issues and define a holistic analysis of Rayleigh waves, we implemented a procedure to acquire data that are useful to define and efficiently invert the three objective functions defined from the three following “objects”: the velocity spectra of the vertical- and radial-components and the Rayleigh-wave particle motion (RPM) frequency-offset data. Two possible implementations are presented. In the first case we consider classical multi-offset (and multi-component) data, while in a second possible approach we exploit the data recorded by a single three-component geophone at a fixed offset from the source. Given the simple field procedures, the method could be particularly useful for the unambiguous geotechnical exploration of large areas, where more complex acquisition procedures, based on the joint acquisition of Rayleigh and Love waves, would not be economically viable. After illustrating the different kinds of data acquisition and the data processing, the results of the proposed methodology are illustrated in a case study. Finally, a series of theoretical and practical aspects are discussed to clarify some issues involved in the overall procedure (data acquisition and processing).

Highlights

  • The SO-Rayleigh-wave particle motion (RPM)-HS approach varies from the method presented in Dal Moro et al (2015a, b, 2016), where we considered the combined analysis of the Z and R group-velocity spectra with the radial-tovertical spectral ratio (RVSR) curve

  • While in Dal Moro et al (2015c) we considered the multi-component joint inversion of the phase velocity spectra of Love and Rayleigh waves, we here focus on Rayleigh waves only and consider the joint analysis of the phase velocity spectra together with the RPM frequency-offset surface

  • We introduced and discussed the joint analysis of the RPM data together with the velocity spectra of the vertical and radial components of Rayleigh waves

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The exploitation of surface-wave propagation for the determination of the vertical shear-wave velocity (VS) profile is nowadays routinely adopted for a number of seismological and geotechnical applications (e.g., Poggi and Fah 2010; Luo et al 2011; O’Connell and Turner 2011; Boxberger et al 2011; Zhang et al 2017).A number of active and passive techniques aimed at retrieving the dispersive properties of the investigated site have been proposed (for an overview, see Dal Moro 2014; Foti et al 2014) but we should highlight that the way we invert the obtained dispersive properties is a different issue.Surface-wave analysis is typically accomplished in two steps: 1. determination of the dispersive properties of the site; 2. their inversion (aimed at determining the subsurface VS model).The multi-channel analysis of surface waves (MASW) is a very well known acronym typically used to indicate the classical approach to determine the dispersive properties from multi-channel (multioffset) active data. A number of active and passive techniques aimed at retrieving the dispersive properties of the investigated site have been proposed (for an overview, see Dal Moro 2014; Foti et al 2014) but we should highlight that the way we invert the obtained dispersive properties is a different issue. Surface-wave analysis is typically accomplished in two steps: 1. Determination of the dispersive properties of the site; 2. The multi-channel analysis of surface waves (MASW) is a very well known acronym typically used to indicate the classical approach to determine the dispersive properties from multi-channel (multioffset) active data. Only the vertical-component of Rayleigh waves is considered and the obtained velocity spectrum (which represents the dispersive properties of the site) is interpreted in terms of modal curves A series of spaced geophones is deployed and the acquired seismic traces are used to define the phase velocity spectrum (Xia et al 1999; Dal Moro et al 2003).

Objectives
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.