Abstract
There are now a wide range of tools available to monitor employees, boasting sophisticated features like keystroke logging, geolocational tracking and video surveillance. From a legal perspective, employee monitoring is most commonly analysed in terms of the impact it has on an employee's control over their information and data, ie their ‘informational privacy’. This article argues that monitoring is a more complex and layered issue, requiring the consideration of other values as well. Specifically, we argue that there are two (by no means exhaustive) reasons why employee monitoring is concerning which go beyond the use of information and data. First, monitoring affects physical and spatial, not just informational, components of privacy. Second, monitoring can be so severe in extreme cases that it curtails individual liberty and constitutes a form of imprisonment. The article draws out the significant legal implications of each of these claims, while addressing counterarguments to our position based on employee consent and the idea that work has always involved constraints on individual freedom.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.