Abstract

AbstractTo strike the post‐grant balance of interests between copyright owners and users, this paper defines three normative types of implied licenses. The typological framework recognizes a hierarchical degree of deference to copyright owners' intent, such that its function varies from the high degree of deference in the opt‐in system to the intermediate degree of the opt‐out system, down to the lowest degree of the nonoption system. The three systems in this framework, working on a sliding scale, reflect and further the flexibility of the doctrine. Moreover, given the complexity of weighing the conflicting interests of copyright owners and users, a prescription for elements to be considered, taken from existing cases and the function of the doctrine, is required to slide the application of the doctrine from one type to another. In this way, a greater degree of certainty of the doctrine is improved and the predictability of judicial decisions is increased.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.