Abstract

Humans can automatically detect and learn to exploit repeated aspects (regularities) of the environment. Timing research suggests that such learning is not only used to anticipate what will happen, but also when it will happen. However, in timing experiments, the intervals to be timed are presented in isolation from other stimuli and explicitly cued, contrasting with naturalistic environments in which intervals are embedded in a constant stream of events and individuals are hardly aware of them. It is unclear whether laboratory findings from timing research translate to a more ecologically valid, implicit environment. Here we show in a game-like experiment, specifically designed to measure naturalistic behavior, that participants implicitly use regular intervals to anticipate future events, even when these intervals are constantly interrupted by irregular yet behaviorally relevant events. This finding extends previous research by showing that individuals not only detect such regularities but can also use this knowledge to decide when to act in a complex environment. Furthermore, this finding demonstrates that this type of learning can occur independently from the ordinal sequence of motor actions, which contrasts this work with earlier motor learning studies. Taken together, our results demonstrate that regularities in the time between events are implicitly monitored and used to predict and act on what happens when, thereby showing that laboratory findings from timing research can generalize to naturalistic environments. Additionally, with the development of our game-like experiment, we demonstrate an approach to test cognitive theories in less controlled, ecologically more valid environments.

Highlights

  • While the brain is continuously confronted with a highly dynamic stream of information, this sensory flood contains regularities which the brain capitalizes upon to reduce processing load

  • A long tradition of timing research has shown that regularities in the interval duration between events can be learned and steer preparatory behavior: conditioned rabbits close their eyes in response to an air puff, but only do so around the point in time of expected delivery (Schneiderman & Gormezano, 1964); infants automatically track the interval duration of rhythmic auditory stimuli (Brannon et al, 2004); and adults optimize preparation at time points where an event is likely to occur (Coull & Nobre, 1998; Niemi & Naatanen, 1981; Woodrow, 1914; Steinborn et al, 2009)

  • Model comparisons revealed that reaction time (RT) to the regular target was lower than to irregular targets ( BIC = 77.40, Bayes factors (BF) > 1000; χ 2(3) = 108.25, p < 0.001), lower in the explicit phase compared to the implicit phase ( BIC = 78.51, BF > 1000; χ 2(2) = 99.08, p < 0.001), and that there was an interaction between ‘regularity’ and ‘phase’ ( BIC = 47.22, BF > 1000; χ 2(1) = 57.50, p < 0.001), entailing that regular and irregular targets differed more in the explicit than the implicit phase

Read more

Summary

Introduction

While the brain is continuously confronted with a highly dynamic stream of information, this sensory flood contains regularities which the brain capitalizes upon to reduce processing load. Psychon Bull Rev (2021) 28:1270–1280 argued that such adaptation to regular intervals is driven by an implicit, automatic memory process. We have implemented this memory proposal in a computational framework and showed that adaptation effects to the distribution of intervals used in the experiment can be accounted for by automatic Hebbian learning between a representation of time and a motor layer (Salet et al, under review). This further support the view that adaptation to regular intervals stem from implicit mechanisms, much like statistical learning

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.