Abstract

The fabric and minor structures that reveal the geometric and kinematic evolution of this shear zone are described, analyzed and presented in detail. Incipient fabrics and structures are developed in the whole CCB but more intensely developed toward middle of the CCB. Kinematic indicators confirm consistent top-to-SW shearing along this zone. Microstructural analysis of the constituent minerals demonstrates that deformation mechanism is not uniform throughout the CCB but varies from the boundaries toward the middle of the CCB. Quantitative analysis of grain-scale geometries across the CCB reveals that the deformation is spatial and temporally concentrated along the middle zone of the belt. We interpret the middle of the CCB as the central part of the broad shear zone along which the upper part of the CCB is thrust over the basal part of the CCB. The shear zone is developed through the axial zone of the overturned isoclinal synformal fold and then progressively developed outwards by further superposition of shear and flattening strain during which time the whole CCB became a broad shear zone. The Apatite Fission Track (AFT) dating of the CCB and the HHC rocks shows differential exhumation history. The results indicate that the HHC forming the hanging wall of the MCT cooled below the closing temperature of apatite FT at 1.65 ± 0.18 Ma. The FT apatite ages of the CCB along Kali-Darma valleys are older than the HHC but appear to fall in two distinct groups. In the northern part of the CCB the weighted mean of FT apatite age is 9.60 ± 0.14 Ma while in the southern part it is 14.10 ± 0.07 Ma. It confirms that the differential paleotopography caused by top-to-SW thrusting at the middle of the CCB played major role for different erosive denudation and hence exhumation of the CCB. It also appears that the HHC has exhumed rapidly than the CCB due to repeated reactivation of the MCT coupled with rapid erosive denudation. The widespread presence of extensional structures indicates that extension was not limited to localized deformation, but affected the whole CCB and overprints the contractional Himalayan deformation. The extensional deformation was related to tectonic loading and uplift of the Himalaya (Patel et al. 1993).

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.