Implementation of Viscoelastic Testing at the Point of Care: Practical Pearls for Clinical Integration.

Guidelines recommend using viscoelastic coagulation tests to guide coagulation management, but interpreting the results remains challenging. Visual Clot, a 3D animated blood clot, facilitates interpretation through a user-centered and situation awareness-oriented design. This study aims to compare the effects of Visual Clot versus conventional viscoelastic test results (rotational thrombelastometry [ROTEM] temograms) on the coagulation management performance of anesthesia teams in critical bleeding situations. We conducted a prospective, randomized, high-fidelity simulation study in which anesthesia teams (consisting of a senior anesthesiologist, a resident anesthesiologist, and an anesthesia nurse) managed perioperative bleeding scenarios. Teams had either Visual Clot or ROTEM temograms available to perform targeted coagulation management. We analyzed the 15-minute simulations with post hoc video analysis. The primary outcome was correct targeted coagulation therapy. Secondary outcomes were time to targeted coagulation therapy, confidence, and workload. In addition, we have conducted a qualitative survey on user acceptance of Visual Clot. We used Poisson regression, Cox regression, and mixed logistic regression models, adjusted for various potential confounders, to analyze the data. We analyzed 59 simulations. Teams using Visual Clot were more likely to deliver the overall targeted coagulation therapy correctly (rate ratio 1.56, 95% CI 1.00-2.47; P=.05) and administer the first targeted coagulation product faster (hazard ratio 2.58, 95% CI 1.37-4.85; P=.003). In addition, participants showed higher decision confidence with Visual Clot (odds ratio 3.60, 95% CI 1.49-8.71; P=.005). We found no difference in workload (coefficient -0.03, 95% CI -3.08 to 2.88; P=.99). Using Visual Clot led to a more accurate and faster-targeted coagulation therapy than using ROTEM temograms. We suggest that relevant viscoelastic test manufacturers consider augmenting their complex result presentation with intuitive, easy-to-understand visualization to ease users' burden from unnecessary cognitive load and enhance patient care.

Point-of-care testing: a standard of care?

Assessment of platelet function utilizing viscoelastic testing.

The early recognition of perioperative coagulation disorders is essential to identify non-surgical reasons of bleeding, to initiate appropriate haemostatic treatment and finally to reduce perioperative blood loss. Conventional laboratory coagulation tests include prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), fibrinogen levels and platelet counts. Although these parameters are frequently assessed, their value has been challenged at least in the setting of acute perioperative bleeding [1]. PT and aPTT are performed in an artificial ‘in vitro’ system, i.e. in plasma separated from whole blood, which is then warmed to 37 C and buffered to a pH of 7AE4. These standardized conditions often do not reflect the patient’s situation [2]. Plasmatic ‘in vitro’ tests merely reflect the time elapsing until the activation of thrombin, but provide only marginal information about the functional state of the coagulation system (e.g. platelet function, interaction of plasmatic coagulation factors with platelets and red blood cells, clot firmness, fibrinolysis). Routine coagulation tests are mostly performed in the central laboratory, i.e. remote from the operating theatre. As a consequence, test results are often not available in time or with a considerable delay [3]. Current devices designed for point-of-care (POC) monitoring of coagulation have been designed for the assessment of coagulation directly at the bedside, so that results could be available earlier. Moreover, POC tests are usually performed in whole blood, thereby comprising interactions between cellular components (i.e. platelets and red blood cells) and plasmatic coagulation factors. Commonly used POC devices for assessment of plasmatic coagulation and platelet function are listed in Table 1. This review focuses on rotation thrombelastography (ROTEM ) as a global coagulation test and multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA, Multiplate ) for assessment of platelet function. Rotation thrombelastometry (ROTEM )

Be part of the game!

In severely injured patients, trauma-induced coagulopathy (TIC) present at hospital admission is associated with increased transfusion requirements, morbidity and mortality. Early and effective treatment contributes to improved survival rates. Laboratory coagulation assays have long turn-around times and evidence for their usefulness, especially in the context of TIC, is weak. Due to the lack of appropriate guidance, transfusion of allogeneic blood products frequently follows a ratio-based concept (e.g., transfusion of erythrocytes and plasma in a 1 : 1 ratio). Point-of-care (PoC) tests enable the assessment of prothrombin time (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin time in few minutes. However, although normal PT in these tests allows to rule out relevant effects of several anticoagulants, they are not able to detect patients with TIC and/or requiring subsequent massive transfusion. Viscoelastic tests (VETs) make it possible to assess defects in thrombin generation, hypofibrinogenaemia, thrombocytopenia, and hyperfibrinolysis, and thus enable targeted therapy. Impairment of platelet function is the common blind spot not detectable using both standard laboratory-based tests and VETs. However, PoC platelet function tests enable to detect platelet defects and patients taking anti-platelet. Furthermore, impaired platelet function has been identified as a strong predictor for coagulopathy and massive transfusion in trauma patients. In other clinical settings, coagulation management based on VETs is associated with decreased transfusion requirements, incidence of acute kidney failure, and mortality, respectively. Data of the first small prospective randomised trial indicate superiority of VET guided coagulation management solely using coagulation factor concentrates, when compared to plasma transfusions in severe trauma.

In this issue of Transplantation, Carrier et al1 describe a study that assesses the effect of preoperative fibrinogen levels on perioperative bleeding and outcomes. In 613 patients with end-stage liver disease who underwent liver transplantation between 2008 and 2019, preoperative low fibrinogen levels were associated with more blood loss but not worse 1-y survival in univariate and multivariate statistical models. This effect was most prominent when fibrinogen levels were below 3 g/L before surgery. In any model of coagulation, fibrinogen is the substrate required to create an effective clot and provide hemostasis. Like most components of hemostasis, fibrinogen is synthesized by the liver and reduced in severe liver disease. Additionally, and maybe more commonly‚ dysfibrinogenemia occurs in liver disease resulting in defects of the fibrinogen structure with undetermined effects on hemostasis.2 The coagulation abnormalities associated with liver disease result in dysbalanced hemostasis that can cause impaired clot formation or excessive thrombosis. Conventional coagulation tests cannot detect this dysbalanced hemostasis‚ as they measure only (a part of) the procoagulant side of hemostasis. Viscoelastic testing, now routinely used in many transplant centers‚ may provide a better assessment of all aspects of clot formation by creating a visual representation of changes in the viscosity of blood when a clot forms. Viscoelastic testing can guide transfusion management in many clinical scenarios‚ including liver transplantation‚ but possibly, more importantly, allows us to identify patients who are hypercoagulable even when the conventional coagulation tests are abnormally high. The results of Carrier et al suggest that low preoperative fibrinogen levels may be an indicator that a patient is at risk for increased intraoperative bleeding. This may be particularly useful if perioperative viscoelastic testing is not used or available as with the study center. This risk of bleeding increased when fibrinogen levels were below 3 g/L before surgery, a level that is far higher than what has traditionally been considered a concerning threshold. Most experts and societies, for example, the review on perioperative coagulation management in liver transplant recipients by Bezinover et al here in Transplantation in 2018,3 recommend fibrinogen concentrate and/or cryoprecipitate transfusion for fibrinogen levels below 1.5 to 2 g/L. Although raising new questions, the present study does not provide enough evidence to change this recommendation at this time. An association with bleeding (even in a multivariate model) does not necessarily mean that replacing fibrinogen with levels over 3 g/L will reduce the risk of bleeding. The assumption is that fibrinogen levels that are below 3 g/L before surgery may decrease more during transplantation to a level that actually impairs hemostasis. Excessive transfusion of cryoprecipitate (and, to a lesser degree, fibrinogen concentrates) is not without risk and may increase the risk of thromboembolic complications.4 The results by Carrier et al are raising new questions about fibrinogen thresholds and may provide the impetus for future (prospective) studies but should not necessarily change our current management. The Centre Hospitalier de L’Universite de Montreal (CHUM) has demonstrated for many years with great success what can be achieved with a concerted effort to reduce blood transfusion5: More than 70% of the patients in the present study did not receive any red blood cell transfusion at all! The center undertakes a number of interventions to achieve these remarkable results. For example, over 50% of the patients in this study underwent phlebotomy at the beginning of surgery. I am not aware of any other center that implemented such a vigorous and successful program to reduce blood transplantation. Unfortunately, this also limits the generalizability of the present study (and reduces the statistical power of the study). Furthermore, because viscoelastic testing was not used in this study, we do not know if lower preoperative fibrinogen levels result in deficient fibrinogen contribution to clot strength later during surgery (assessed, for example, using fibrinogen assays such as FIBTEM with rotational thromboelastometry, ROTEM). In summary, Carrier et al provide important insight into the role of fibrinogen in achieving hemostasis during and good outcomes after liver transplantation. Their data encourage us to check for fibrinogen levels whenever we measure conventional or viscoelastic coagulation tests and design future randomized trials of fibrinogen replacement in liver transplantation.

Patients with end-stage liver disease (ESLD) undergoing liver transplantation (LT) are prone to thromboses both while on the waiting list and in the perioperative period. This hypercoagulability is associated with significant endothelial dysfunction (ED) due to nitric oxide dysregulation. ED and increased thrombin generation are the main factors responsible for this hypercoagulability. Sepsis alone can significantly alter a patient’s coagulation profile. In combination with ESLD, however, sepsis or septic shock are responsible for very complex changes. This makes both the assessment and management of coagulation in septic patients with ESLD very challenging. Viscoelastic testing (VET) is the preferred method of coagulation management in patients with cirrhosis because, as with standard laboratory testing, VET can assess the entire coagulation system including the interaction between both pro- and anticoagulants and platelets.

Coagulation Management after Trauma in the Presence of Direct Oral Anticoagulants.

Coagulation management by transfusion of allogenic blood products and coagulation factors are competing concepts in current trauma care. Rapid and adequate therapy of trauma-associated coagulopathy is crucial to survival of severely injured patients. Standard coagulation tests such as prothrombin time and activated partial thromboplastin time are commonly used, but these tests are inappropriate for monitoring and guiding therapy in trauma patients. Coagulation factor-based treatment showed promising results, but randomized trials have not yet been performed. In addition, viscoelastic tests are needed to guide therapy, although there is in fact limited evidence for these in tests in trauma care. Regarding transfusion therapy with allogenic blood products, plasma transfusion has been associated with improved survival in trauma patients following massive transfusion. In contrast, patients not requiring massive transfusion seem to be at risk for suffering complications with increasing volumes of plasma transfused. The collective of trauma patients is heterogeneous. Despite the lack of evidence, there are strong arguments for individualized patient treatment with coagulation factors for some indications and to abstain from the use of fresh frozen plasma. In patients with severe trauma and major bleeding, plasma, platelets, and red blood cells should be considered to be administered at a ratio of 1 : 1 : 1.

Over the last decades, individualized approaches and a better understanding of coagulopathy complexity in end-stage liver disease (ESLD) patients has evolved. The risk of both thrombosis and bleeding during minimally invasive interventions or surgery is associated with a worse outcome in this patient population. Despite deranged quantitative and qualitative coagulation laboratory parameters, prophylactic coagulation management is unnecessary for patients who do not bleed. Transfusion of red blood cells (RBCs) and blood products carries independent risks for morbidity and mortality, including modulation of the immune system with increased risk for nosocomial infections. Optimal coagulation management in these complex patients should be based on the analysis of standard coagulation tests (SCTs) and viscoelastic tests (VETs). VETs represent an individualized approach to patients and can provide information about coagulation dynamics in a concise period of time. This narrative review will deliver the pathophysiology of deranged hemostasis in ESLD, explore the difficulties of evaluating the coagulopathies in liver disease patients, and examine the use of VET assays and management of coagulopathy using coagulation factors. Methods: A selective literature search with PubMed as the central database was performed with the following.

Liver transplantation (LT) is frequently complicated by coagulopathy associated with end-stage liver disease (ESLD), that is, often multifactorial. The objective of this systematic review was to identify evidence based intraoperative transfusion and coagulation management strategies that improve immediate and short-term outcomes after LT. PRISMA-guidelines and GRADE-approach were followed. Three subquestions were formulated. (Q); Q1: transfusion management; Q2: antifibrinolytic therapy; and Q3: coagulation monitoring. Sixteen studies were included for Q1, six for Q2, and 10 for Q3. Q1: PRBC and platelet transfusions were associated with higher mortality. The use of prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) and fibrinogen concentrate (FC) were not associated with reductions in intraoperative transfusion or increased thrombotic events. The use of cell salvage was not associated with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence or mortality. Cell salvage and transfusion education significantly decreased blood product transfusions. Q2: Epsilon-aminocaproic acid (EACA) and tranexamic acid (TXA) were not associated with decreased blood product transfusion, improvements in patient or graft survival, or increases in thrombotic events. Q3: Viscoelastic testing (VET) was associated with decreased allogeneic blood product transfusion compared to conventional coagulation tests (CCT) and is likely to be cost-effective. Coagulation management guided by VET may be associated with increases in FC and PCC use. Q1: A specific blood product transfusion practice is not recommended (QOE; low | Recommendation; weak). Cell salvage and educational interventions are recommended (QOE: low | Grade of Recommendation: moderate). Q2: The routine use of antifibrinolytics is not recommended (QOE; low | Recommendation; weak). Q3: The use of VET is recommended (QOE; low-moderate | Recommendation; strong).

The challenge of translating knowledge learned in the classroom into real life situations for students has been an issue in nursing education for many years. Very few research studies have been conducted that address what factors positively and negatively affect nursing students’ self-confidence in the clinical setting. The purpose of this study was to explore the perceptions of nursing students’ self-confidence in the acute care setting and the factors that enhanced or inhibited their self-confidence. The specific research questions that guided this study were: What are the perceptions of nursing students’ self-confidence in the acute care clinical setting? What factors improve students’ self-confidence in the acute care clinical setting? and What factors negatively impact nursing students’ self-confidence in the acute care clinical setting? An exploratory descriptive qualitative design utilizing the Critical Incident Technique (CIT) was used to collect data from senior nursing students who had at least two acute care clinical practicums. In-person, open-ended, semi-structured face-to-face audio-recorded interviews were used to collect the data from 11 senior students from two different colleges of nursing. Data obtained from CIT’s were analyzed through an inductive classification process. A total of 21 incidents were derived from the data. Six of the incidents were related to the delivery of patient care and learning skills, another seven were related to medication administration, and eight were related to communication. The belief by the students that they could be successful in providing effective patient care was a contributing factor in enhancing their self-confidence. Knowing how to perform procedures and administer medications, and being educated prior to the performance of a nursing skill, resulted in the students feeling more self-confident in themselves and in their ability to be successful. Making a difference in a patient’s life, open communication, feeling like a member of a team, feeling that they (the student) could be trusted to care for the patient, and having support from the staff nurses and clinical instructors were also found to positively influence the students’ development of self-confidence. Factors that negatively impacted the students’ self-confidence included not being educated, a lack of communication, lack of support, lack of trust, and not feeling like a member of a team. Implications for knowledge development, research, nursing education, and nursing practice are discussed. Further research is needed to explore the development of self-confidence over the course of a students’ undergraduate education. Additionally, more qualitative research studies with larger samples, including

Background/Objectives: Liver transplantation (LT) is often complicated by severe bleeding and coagulopathy. Viscoelastic testing (VET) offers real-time, bedside assessment of coagulation and may improve transfusion management compared to standard tests. This study evaluates the clinical impact of VET implementation during liver transplantation on bleeding, transfusion requirements, complications, and mortality in a single Eastern European tertiary transplant center. Methods: We conducted a single-center before-and-after study comparing patients undergoing LT before and after the implementation of VET. All procedures were performed by the same surgical and anesthetic team using a standardized protocol. Data were collected retrospectively for the Before VET group and prospectively for the After VET group. We compared transfusion requirements, bleeding, complications, and mortality. Results: A total of 59 patients were included, 22 in the After VET group and 37 in the Before VET group. VET implementation was associated with lower intraoperative blood loss (median 4000 mL vs. 6000 mL, p = 0.017) and reduced red blood cell (RBC) transfusion volume (670 mL vs. 1000 mL, p = 0.008). FFP (0.23 vs. 1.59 units, p = 0.007) and platelet use (0.68 vs. 1.81 units, p = 0.035) were also significantly lower in the VET group, while fibrinogen use was higher (3.00 g vs. 2.00 g, p = 0.036). No differences were observed in complication rates or mortality at 30 days and 1 year in this small before-and-after study. Conclusions: VET improved transfusion precision and individualized coagulation management during LT, leading to reduced use of blood products. These findings support the adoption of VET as a standard of care in LT protocols, as it may enhance patient safety, even though no differences in postoperative complications or mortality were observed.

Introduction: Ethics programs have become essential for healthcare organisations to adopt and implement ethical practices. Ethics in healthcare institutions is crucial to maintain trust and confidence in patients and stakeholders. Aims: This research paper aims to investigate the effectiveness of ethics programs in promoting the adoption and implementation of ethical practices in healthcare organisations. The study focuses on ten healthcare institutions and considers ethical practices as the dependent variable and implementation of ethics programs, organisational culture, employee training, leadership involvement, and regulatory compliance as independent variables. Method: The study uses a quantitative research approach, and data was collected through a structured questionnaire survey. Descriptive statistics were applied to summarise the data, while correlation analysis, regression analysis, ANOVA, and other statistical techniques were employed to analyse the relationships between the variables. The sample size was determined using the power analysis technique, and the data collected were analysed using statistical software. Results: The findings revealed a significant positive relationship between implementing ethics programs and ethical practices. The study also found a positive correlation between organisational culture, employee training, leadership involvement, regulatory compliance, and ethical practices. The regression analysis showed that implementing ethics programs was the most significant predictor of ethical practices in healthcare organisations. Conclusion: The study concludes that adopting and implementing ethics programs effectively promote ethical practices in healthcare organisations. Moreover, the study emphasises the importance of organisational culture, employee training, leadership involvement, and regulatory compliance in enhancing the effectiveness of ethics programs. The findings of this study can be employed as a guide by healthcare organisations to improve their ethical practices and ensure trust and confidence among patients and stakeholders.