Abstract
Selected issues in the first implementation cycle of the New Zealand Accident Compensation program were studied according to the Sabotier and Mazmanian conceptual framework for analyzing the implementation of public policy. The application revealed both strengths and limitations in the framework's explanatory scope. It is argued that its limitations stemmed from the omission of the conceptual variables needed to analyze the organizational dynamics involved in the administration of a composite social program. The need for the inclusion of such variables is justified on the grounds that most public programs are composite and so their implementation is greatly influenced by the relative administrative emphasis on each activity. Variables that could be added to the framework to increase the scope of its explanatory power are suggested.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
