Abstract

A comparison is made of the performance of two types of adsorbent solid phases (commercially sourced Streamline composites and custom-assembled Zirblast pelliculates), derivatised with similar anion exchange chemistries and applied to the recovery of plasmid DNA from Escherichia coli extracts prepared by chemical lysis and coarse filtration. Streamline and Zirblast adsorbents were characterised by average particle diameters of 200 and 95 μm, densities of 1.16 and 3.85 g/m 2, and small ion capacities of 170 and 8 μmol/ml settled adsorbent, respectively. Detailed analysis of products and impurities in a full operational cycle of adsorption, washing, pre-elution, elution and regeneration processes was enabled by the harnessing of a battery of analyses for nucleic acid and organic solute content of feedstocks and bed effluents exploiting ultra-violet spectrophotometry, agarose gel electrophoresis and specific reactions with the fluorescent probe PicoGreen. In comparative tests operated under near identical conditions, Streamline and Zirblast adsorbents exhibited plasmid recoveries of 76 and 90% of bound product characterised by purity ratios (relative PicoGreen and A 254 estimates of mass) of 9 and 32, respectively. Conclusions are drawn regarding the specific impact of the physical and topographical characteristics of solid-phase geometry upon product throughput, achievable product purity, process time-scales and operational economics for the manufacture of plasmid DNA.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.