Abstract

IntroductionThe objective of this study was to examine reimbursement trends for emergency provider professional services following the balance billing ban in California.MethodsWe conducted a blinded web-based survey to collect claims data from emergency providers and billing companies. Members of the California Chapter of the American College of Emergency Physicians (California ACEP) reimbursement committee were invited to participate in the survey. We used a convenience sample of claims to determine payment rates before and after the balance billing ban.ResultsWe examined a total of 55,243 claims to determine the percentage of charges paid before and after the balance billing ban took effect on October 15, 2008. The overall reduction in percentage of charges paid was 13% in the first year and 19% in the second year following the balance billing ban. The average percentage of charges paid by health plans decreased from 91% to 86% from 2008 to 2010. Payments by risk-bearing organizations decreased from 72% to 46% of charges during the same time frame.ConclusionPayment rates by subcontracted risk-bearing organizations for non-contracted emergency department professional services declined significantly following the balanced billing ban whereas payment rates by health plans remained relatively stable.

Highlights

  • The objective of this study was to examine reimbursement trends for emergency provider professional services following the balance billing ban in California

  • The average percentage of charges paid by health plans decreased from 91% to 86% from 2008 to 2010

  • Data were available for 12 of 54 health plans listed on the Department of Managed Health Care (DMHC) website and 114 of 291 risk-bearing organizations (RBOs)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The objective of this study was to examine reimbursement trends for emergency provider professional services following the balance billing ban in California. Many health plans offer health insurance through health maintenance organizations (HMOs) that in turn provide medical services to enrollees through contracted provider networks. California and a few other states allow health plans to delegate financial responsibility for payment of emergency providers’ claims to risk-bearing organizations (RBOs). RBOs are usually medical foundations, medical groups or independent physician organizations that receive fixed periodic payments from health plans.[2] In return, the RBO is responsible for providing healthcare services to health plan enrollees. In California, when a HMO patient receives out-ofnetwork emergency care services, health plans or the delegated

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.