Impact of Subsurface Drainage on Improvement of Crop Production and Farm Income in North-West India

Abstract

The Indian Council of Agricultural research has given priority to control and manage salinity problems that have developed in north-west India. Multi-disciplinary taskforces have recommended installation of subsurface drainage for salinity control, based on design and management techniques developed by the Central Soil Salinity Research Institute (CSSRI), to rehabilitate lands with excess soil salinity. After small-scale studies, large-scale pilot projects were launched to install subsurface drainage in problem areas. One such attempt in was initiated in the north-west region of India where a large-scale drainage project was carried out with Dutch collaboration. We assessed the impact of investments in subsurface drainage in order to validate past funding on research of drainage in India. The important methods used for assessing the efficiency benefits of drainage investment were: to determine the impact of subsurface drainage in terms of net present value, internal rate of returns, consumers' surplus and producers' surplus; to assess the social welfare in terms of social equality and sustainability of the drainage system; and to examine the factors affecting the sustainability of the technology. The internal rate of return was computed to assess the efficiency parameter of subsurface drainage for salinity management. In order to measure the changes in inequality distribution of income, Gini concentration ratios were computed with and without installing sub surface drainage. The Radar Approach, a method based on a graphical display of differences between actual ideal performance, was used to quantify drainage sustainability in terms of optimizing gains and conserving, or improving the quality of soil and water resources. There were several farm-level benefits as a result of installing subsurface drainage: these included: (i) a substantial increase in farm income; (ii) cropping intensification and diversification toward high value crops; and (iii) generation employment. A high internal rate of return justified investment in subsurface drainage. Income inequalities across farms were reduced. The radar approach showed improvement in sustainability in terms of economic gains and resource conservation. Despite of these economic, social, and environmental benefits, the sustainability of subsurface drainage technology is questionable. The specific reasons include: (i) the nature of the technology; (ii) lukewarm collective action by the beneficiaries; (iii) conflicting objectives among beneficiaries; and (iv) growing numbers of free riders. To a large extent these were addressed in the study area by forming village committees. Without appropriate institutional arrangements, subsurface drainage may not yield the desired results, and in the long run may result in neglect of operation and maintenance needs and ultimately the abandonment of the technology.