Abstract

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are myeloid neoplasms that are driven by genetic mutations. Generally, it is thought that a higher number of mutations is associated with worse prognosis. However, the impact of genetic mutations when they occur in the same functional class has not been well studied. Here we investigated the impact of multiple spliceosome mutations on prognosis in MDS patients, hypothesizing that multiple mutations in the same class are biologically redundant and would not affect prognosis. Departmental Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) database (>6000 cases) was queried and the data was analyzed to identify cases with spliceosome mutations (SF3B1, SRSF2, U2AF1, ZRSR2, U2AF1). Overall, 71 patients met criteria for the study. Cases with single spliceosome mutations (i.e., no other co-mutations whatsoever) were as follows: SF3B1 (38), SRSF2 (5), U2AF2 (11), and ZRSR2 (1). Cases with concurrent spliceosome mutations were as follows: SF3B1 + SRSF2 (5), SF3B1 + U2AF1 (1), SF3B1 + ZRSR2 (3), SRSF2 + U2AF1 (2), SRSF2 + ZRSR2 (1), U2AF1 + ZRSR2 (4). Four of 55 (7.3%) of patients in the single mutation group vs. 4 of 16 (25%) of patients in the concurrent mutation group progressed to acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Mean OS in the single mutation group was 103.5 months vs. 71.6 months in the multiple concurrent mutation group (χ2= 2.404; p= 0.12). Our results challenge the current dogma that increased mutation in MDS portend worse survival. We demonstrate that multiple mutations bear no impact on clinical prognosis when the additional mutations occur in same spliceosome class.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.