Abstract
BackgroundTraditional methods using microscopy for the detection of helminth infections have limited sensitivity. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays enhance detection of helminths, particularly low burden infections. However, differences in test performance may modify the ability to detect associations between helminth infection, risk factors, and sequelae. We compared these associations using microscopy and PCR.MethodsThis cross-sectional study was nested within a randomized clinical trial conducted at 3 sites in Kenya. We performed microscopy and real-time multiplex PCR for the stool detection and quantification of Ascaris lumbricoides, Necator americanus, Ancylostoma duodenale, Strongyloides stercoralis, and Schistosoma species. We utilized regression to evaluate associations between potential risk factors or outcomes and infection as detected by either method.ResultsOf 153 HIV-positive adults surveyed, 55(36.0%) and 20(13.1%) were positive for one or more helminth species by PCR and microscopy, respectively (p<0.001). PCR-detected infections were associated with farming (Prevalence Ratio 1.57, 95% CI: 1.02, 2.40), communal water source (PR 3.80, 95% CI: 1.01, 14.27), and no primary education (PR 1.54, 95% CI: 1.14, 2.33), whereas microscopy-detected infections were not associated with any risk factors under investigation. Microscopy-detected infections were associated with significantly lower hematocrit and hemoglobin (means of -3.56% and -0.77 g/dl) and a 48% higher risk of anemia (PR 1.48, 95% CI: 1.17, 1.88) compared to uninfected. Such associations were absent for PCR-detected infections unless infection intensity was considered, Infections diagnosed with either method were associated with increased risk of eosinophilia (PCR PR 2.42, 95% CI: 1.02, 5.76; microscopy PR 2.92, 95% CI: 1.29, 6.60).ConclusionNewer diagnostic methods, including PCR, improve the detection of helminth infections. This heightened sensitivity may improve the identification of risk factors for infection while reducing ability to discriminate infections associated with adverse clinical outcomes. Quantitative assays can be used to differentiate infection loads and discriminate infections associated with sequelae.
Highlights
The burden of soil-transmitted helminth infections and schistosomiasis is considerable; there are over a billion infections globally, with more than half of these infections occurring in Sub-Saharan Africa[1]
Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) markedly increased detection of helminth infections when compared with traditional microscopy in a cohort of HIVinfected adults
The increased sensitivity of the PCR assay resulted in greater power to detect several risk factors significantly associated with helminth infection in the cohort, which were not detected in analyses of the same cohort using stool microscopy
Summary
The burden of soil-transmitted helminth infections and schistosomiasis is considerable; there are over a billion infections globally, with more than half of these infections occurring in Sub-Saharan Africa[1]. Helminth infections have traditionally been detected using stool microscopy techniques, which have high specificity but limited sensitivity[7,8,9,10], especially in populations where infection intensity (based on egg excretion) is low. Newer assays, including polymerase chain reaction (PCR), have higher sensitivity and high specificity and enhance detection of helminth infections[11,12,13]. As these newer diagnostic assays become more available and are more widely used, it is important to determine the impact that such testing will have on our understanding of the risk factors and consequences of helminth infection. As HIV-infection may alter excretion of parasite eggs in stool due to immunodysregulation[30], we assessed the impact of immune status (as measured by CD4 count level) on the ability of these assays to detect helminth infection
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
