Impact of fluoxetine on innate immunity and melanoma metastasis in mice.

administration of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI) enhances dopaminergic activity. However, the role of enhanced dopaminergic transmission in the therapeutic effects of this kind of antidepressants is still unclear. Drugs producing dopaminergic activation lead to an increment in general activity. Thus, it is reasonable to assume that some of the therapeutic effects of SSRIs are due to dopaminergic enhanced functionality. The forced swim test (FST) is a widely used test in the screening of new compounds with potential antidepressant activity. In this study the effects of pretreatment with low doses of the DA release inductor cocaine and the D2, D3 and D4 antagonist haloperidol were analyzed in the FST on rats submitted to chronic intragastric administration of the SSRI fluoxetine. Our results show that animals treated with fluoxetine and pre-treated with cocaine had significantly higher latencies than saline or haloperidol pre-treated subjects. Among both fluoxetine and saline treated animals, those pre-treated with cocaine had significant lesser immobility time. Haloperidol pre-treated animals had significantly higher immobility time than those pre-treated with saline. From these results, it is clear that the pharmacological modification of dopaminergic systems leads to behavioral changes in rats treated with both saline and fluoxetine. The FST does not have enough precision as to distinguish between dopaminergic and non- dopaminergic components in the antidepressant effects of SSRIs, for this reason the use of the FST in combination to other models is mandatory. Keywords: forced swim test, antidepressant, fluoxetine, cocaine, haloperidol.

We previously reported that chronic, but not subchronic, treatment with the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) fluoxetine altered behavior in the forced swimming test (FST) in BALB/cJ mice. We now use this model to investigate mechanisms underlying the delayed onset of the behavioral response to antidepressants, specifically (1) adult hippocampal neurogenesis and (2) expression of the 5-HT1A receptor. Here, we show data validating this model of chronic antidepressant action. We found the FST to be selectively responsive to chronic administration of the SSRI fluoxetine (18 mg/kg/day) and the tricyclic antidepressant desipramine (20 mg/kg/day), but not to the antipsychotic haloperidol (1 mg/kg/day) in BALB/cJ mice. The behavioral effects of fluoxetine emerged by 12 days of treatment, and were affected neither by ablation of progenitor cells of the hippocampus nor by genetic deletion of the 5-HT1A receptor. The effect of fluoxetine in the BALB/cJ mice was also neurogenesis-independent in the novelty-induced hypophagia test. We also found that chronic fluoxetine does not induce an increase in cell proliferation or the number of young neurons as measured by BrdU and doublecortin immunolabeling, respectively, in BALB/cJ mice. These data are in contrast to our previous report using a different strain of mice (129SvEvTac). In conclusion, we find that BALB/cJ mice show a robust response to chronic SSRI treatment in the FST, which is not mediated by an increase in new neurons in the hippocampus, and does not require the 5-HT1A receptor. These findings suggest that SSRIs can produce antidepressant-like effects via distinct mechanisms in different mouse strains.

Inhibitory effect of antidepressants on B16F10 melanoma tumor growth

Background: Early life stress is a key predisposing factor for depression and anxiety disorders. Selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors (SSRI) are frequently used as the first line of pharmacology treatment for depression but have several negative qualities, i.e. a delay or absence of effectiveness and negative side-effects. Therefore, there is a growing need for new nutraceutical-based strategies to blunt the effects of adverse-life events. Objectives: This study aimed to use the maternal separation model in rats to test the efficacy of fish oil dietary supplementation, on its own and in conjunction with the SSRI anti-depressant fluoxetine, as a treatment for depressive and anxiety-like symptoms associated with early life stress. Methods: Behavioural tests (open field test, elevated plus maze test and forced swim test) and biochemical markers (corticosterone, BDNF, brain fatty acids and short chain fatty acids) were used to analyse the effects of the dietary treatments. Gut microbial communities and relating metabolites (SCFA) were analysed to investigate possible changes in the microbiota-gut-brain axis. Results: Maternally separated rats showed depressive-like behaviours in the forced swim and open field tests. These behaviours were prevented significantly by fluoxetine administration and in part by fish oil supplementation. Associated biochemical changes reported include altered brain fatty acids, significantly lower plasma corticosterone levels (AUC) and reduced brain stem serotonin turnover, compared to untreated, maternally separated (MS) rats. Untreated MS animals had significantly lower ratios of SCFA producers such as Caldicoprobacteraceae, Streptococcaceae, Rothia, Lachnospiraceae_NC2004_group, and Ruminococcus_2, along with significantly reduced levels of total SCFA compared to non-separated animals. Compared to untreated MS animals, animals fed fish oil had significantly higher Bacteroidetes and Prevotellaceae and reduced levels of butyrate, while fluoxetine treatment resulted in significantly higher levels of Neochlamydia, Lachnoclostridium, Acetitomaculum and Stenotrophomonas and, acetate and propionate. Conclusion: Despite the limitations in extrapolating from animal behavioural data and the notable differences in pharmacokinetics between rodents and humans, the results of this study provide a further advancement into the understanding of some of the complex systems within which nutraceuticals and pharmaceuticals effect the microbiota-gut-brain axis.

Is co-administration of bupropion with SSRIs and SNRIs in forced swimming test in mice, predictive of efficacy in resistant depression?

Antidepressant effects of nicotine and fluoxetine in an animal model of depression induced by neonatal treatment with clomipramine

Depression is a debilitating psychiatric disorder with a huge socioeconomic burden, and its treatment relies on antidepressants including selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). Recently, the melatonergic system that is closely associated with the serotonergic system has been implicated in the pathophysiology and treatment of depression. However, it remains unknown whether combined treatment with SSRI and melatonin has synergistic antidepressant effects. In this study, we applied a sub-chronic restraint stress paradigm, and evaluated the potential antidepressant effects of combined fluoxetine and melatonin in adult male mice. Sub-chronic restraint stress (6h/day for 10days) induced depression-like behavior as shown by deteriorated fur state, increased latency to groom in the splash test, and increased immobility time in the forced-swim test. Repeated administration of either fluoxetine or melatonin at 10mg/kg during stress exposure failed to prevent depression-like phenotypes. However, combined treatment with fluoxetine and melatonin at the selected dose attenuated stress-induced behavioral abnormalities. Moreover, we found that the antidepressant effects of combined treatment were associated with the normalization of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF)-tropomyosin receptor kinase B (TrkB) signaling in the hippocampus, but not in the prefrontal cortex. Our findings suggest that combined fluoxetine and melatonin treatment exerts synergistic antidepressant effects possibly by restoring hippocampal BDNF-TrkB signaling.

Antidepressant like effect of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors involve modulation of imidazoline receptors by agmatine

Serotonergic mediation of the antidepressant-like effect of the green leaves odor in mice

Attenuation of the effects of fluoxetine on serotonergic neuronal activity by pindolol in rats

Antidepressant-like effect of zileuton is accompanied by hippocampal neuroinflammation reduction and CREB/BDNF upregulation in lipopolysaccharide-challenged mice

The forced swimming test (FST) is a behavioral test in rodents that predicts the clinical efficacy of many types of antidepressant treatments. Recently, a behavior sampling technique was developed that scores individual response categories, including swimming, climbing and immobility. Although all antidepressant drugs reduce immobility in the FST, at least two distinct active behavioral patterns are produced by pharmacologically selective antidepressant drugs. Serotonin-selective reuptake inhibitors increase swimming behavior, while drugs acting primarily to increase extracellular levels of norepinephrine or dopamine increase climbing behavior. Distinct patterns of active behaviors in the FST may be mediated by distinct neurotransmitters, but this has not been shown directly. The present study examined the role of serotonin in mediating active behaviors in the forced swimming test after treatment with two antidepressant drugs, the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, fluoxetine and the selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, desipramine. Endogenous serotonin was depleted by administering para-cholorophenylalanine (PCPA, 150 mg/kg, IP.) to rats 72 h and 48 h prior to the swim test. Fluoxetine (10 mg/kg, SC) or desipramine (10 mg/kg, SC) was given three times over a 24-h period prior to the FST. Behavioral responses, including immobility, swimming and climbing, were counted during the 5-min test. Pretreatment with PCPA blocked fluoxetine-induced reduction in immobility and increase in swimming behavior during the FST. In contrast, PCPA pretreatment did not interfere with the ability of desipramine to reduce immobility and increase climbing behavior. Depletion of serotonin prevented the behavioral effects of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor fluoxetine in the rat FST. Furthermore, depletion of serotonin had no impact on the behavioral effects induced by the selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, desipramine. The effects of antidepressant drugs on FST-induced immobility may be exerted by distinguishable contributions from different neurotransmitter systems.

P.2.f.008 Duloxetine increased plasma levels of 3-methoxy-4-hydroxyphenylglycol in patients with major depressive disorder

Locus coeruleus activity in perinatally protein-deprived rats: effects of fluoxetine administration

This study aimed at investigating the effect of several selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), given alone or in combination with anxiolytic drugs, on the time spent immobile in the forced swimming test in mice. The time spent immobile was dose-dependently reduced by acute administration of fluoxetine (4-64 mg/ kg, i.p.), paroxetine (1-32 mg/kg, s.c.) or sertraline (4-32 mg/kg, s.c.), indalpine was active at only one dose (16 mg/kg, i.p.), fluvoxamine (up to 16 mg/kg, i.p.) and citalopram (up to 4 mg/kg, i.p.) were inactive. The anti-immobility effect of fluoxetine (32 mg/kg) was antagonized by an acute co-administration of all anxiolytics tested, the GABAA/BZD receptor agonists, diazepam (2 mg/kg, i.p.), chlordiazepoxide (8 mg/kg, i.p.), lorazepam (0.125 mg/kg, i.p.), triazolam (0.06 mg/kg, i.p.) and alpidem (8 mg/kg, i.p.) and the 5-HT1A receptor partial agonist, buspirone (0.5 mg/kg, s.c.). The sedative neuroleptic, thioridazine (4 mg/kg, i.p.), was also found to counteract the effect of fluoxetine. Lorazepam, triazolam and buspirone also reversed the anti-immobility effect of paroxetine and sertraline, while diazepam and chlordiazepoxide did not. Alpidem reduced the effect of sertraline but not paroxetine, whereas the reverse was found with thioridazine. These data indicate that the influence of anxiolytics on the action of SSRI antidepressants is variable, depending on both the SSRI and the anxiolytic considered. The co-administration of the GABAA/BZD receptor antagonist, flumazenil (16 mg/kg, i.p.), with behaviourally inactive doses of fluoxetine, fluvoxamine and citalopram, resulted in a reduction of immobility. The 5-HT1A receptor antagonist, (+)-WAY 100135 (8 mg/kg, s.c.), combined with a subactive dose of fluoxetine, but not with fluvoxamine, significantly reduced the time spent immobile. The 5-HT2A receptor antagonist, ketanserin (32 mg/kg, s.c.), which reduced immobility when given alone, did not interfere with fluoxetine given at a subactive dose. Although non-specific sedative and/or motor effects cannot be totally ruled out, these results suggest that pharmacodynamic interactions exist between various anxiolytics and SSRIs. These interactions probably involve both serotonergic and GABAergic processes.