Impact of different carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales screening strategies in a hospital setting

Abstract

SummaryBackgroundThe spread of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE) is a global health problem. Gastrointestinal tract carriage makes faeces or rectal swabs the recommended screening methods.AimTo assess the impact of three laboratory screening strategies for CPE on positivity rates and infection prevention and control in a hospital setting in North West England from 2015 to 2017.MethodsIn a retrospective study, time to CPE-positive and -negative results, number of new CPE-positive patients identified, and number of hospital bed-days lost/wards affected were measured for each of three CPE screening strategies; culture plus phenotypic tests, culture plus polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and PCR only (phases 1, 2 and 3, respectively).FindingsThe fastest time to CPE results was PCR only (median: 4.0 h), then culture plus PCR (median: 47.6 h), then culture plus phenotypic tests (median: 49.8 h) (P < 0.001). The mean numbers of hospital bed-days lost per month decreased between phases 2 and 3 (P = 0.01). The mean number of wards/units affected by CPE increased from phase 1 (2.57) to phase 2 (7.71), then decreased in phase 3 (3.86). The percentage positivity rate for phases 1, 2, and 3 were 2.01, 1.38, and 1.55 respectively. From May to October, the number of new CPE-positive patients was lower for phases 1 and 3 than for phase 2. During all three phases there was a peak in the number of newly identified CPE carriers in August.ConclusionThis study provides evidence that using a rapid PCR to screen rectal or faeces swabs enables more timely infection prevention and control measures when compared with culture-based methods. A reduction in bed-days lost due to CPE was observed when rapid molecular screening was introduced.