Abstract

To investigate the impact of cuff pressure on airway leak pressure in laryngeal mask airway(LMA)Supreme and Flexible. Patients about to have elective breast surgery were divided into Supreme group(35 cases)and Flexible group(33 cases). After general induction of anesthesia,LMA Supreme or Flexible was inserted by one anesthesiologist. We confirmed the LMA location,adjusted the cuff pressure,and recorded the peak airway leak pressures under different cuff pressures(10,20,30,40,and 50 cmH2O). In Supreme group,peak airway leak pressures [(24.46±5.43),(25.11±5.51),(25.86±5.57),(26.17±5.72)cmH2O] under 20,30,40,and 50 cmH2O cuff pressure showed no significant difference(P>0.05)between each other,but significantly higher than that under 10 cmH2O cuff pressure(20.80±4.63)cmH2O(P<0.05). And in the Flexible group,peak airway leak pressures [(20.09±2.98),(20.70±3.08),(21.21±3.15)cmH2O] under 30,40,50 cmH2O cuff pressure also showed no significant difference(P>0.05)between each other,but significantly higher than those under 10 or 20 cmH2O cuff pressure [(17.52±2.39),(18.61±2.42)cmH2O]. Mean peak airway leak pressure [(25.40±5.52) cmH2O] of LMA Supreme was significantly higher than that of LMA Flexible(20.67±3.06)cmH2O(P<0.05). Mean airway leak pressure of LMA Supreme is higher than LMA Flexible. The lowest cuff pressure to meet the tightness requirement with LMA Supreme is 20 cmH2O,which is lower than Flexible(30 cmH2O).

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.