Impact of baseline systolic blood pressure on blood pressure changes following renal denervation

Long-term outcomes after catheter-based renal artery denervation for resistant hypertension: final follow-up of the randomised SYMPLICITY HTN-3 Trial

<i>Hypertension</i> Editors’ Picks

A New Era of Renal Denervation Trials for Patients With Hypertension?

Data at 36 months for the Symplicity SPYRAL HTN-ON MED pilot – Authors' reply

Background/Introduction Three recently published sham-controlled studies proved the efficacy of renal denervation (RDN) in hypertensive patients. However, there it is still unclear which patients should be selected for RDN. Purpose This study seeks to clarify which patient subgroups benefit most from radiofrequency RDN by analysing a nationwide multicentre registry database. Methods This is a post-hoc analysis from the multicentre Austrian Transcatheter Renal Denervation Registry hosted by the Austrian Society of Hypertension. We correlated change of systolic blood pressure (BP) after RDN to gender and presence/absence of comorbidities. Bivariate correlation and multiple linear regression analyses were performed. Results 291 patients (43% female, median age 64 years) undergoing RDN between April 2011 and September 2014 were included in this analysis. Mean baseline ambulatory 24-hour BP (systolic/diastolic) was 150±18/89±14 mmHg and mean baseline office BP was 170±16/94±14 mmHg. After RDN, mean ambulatory 24-hour BP reduction was 9±19/6±16 mmHg. The following features were associated with a good response to RDN: high baseline systolic ambulatory BP (ρ=0.53, p&lt;0.001), high baseline diastolic office BP (ρ=0.40, p&lt;0.001), female gender (ρ=0.10, p=0.049), absence of diabetes mellitus (DM, ρ=0.11, p=0.033), and absence of peripheral arterial disease (ρ=0.17, p=0.002). Multivariate analysis identified high baseline systolic ambulatory BP, female gender and absence of DM as independent predictors for systolic ambulatory BP reduction (systolic ambulatory BP: HR 5.83 [95% CI 4.83–6.83], p&lt;0.001; absence of DM: HR 5.82 [2.04–9.60], p=0.003; female gender: HR 5.07 [1.46–8.68], p=0.006), although women and patients without DM had lowest baseline ambulatory BP. Furthermore, both women and patients without DM used significantly less antihypertensives after RDN (female vs male: 4.0±1.3 vs 4.4±1.3, p=0.002; no DM vs DM: 4.0±1.3 vs 4.6±1.3, p&lt;0.001). Figure 1 Discussion Ambulatory BP reductions after RDN were substantially more pronounced in female and in non-diabetic patients despite lower baseline BP. It is concluded that in terms of efficacy female patients and non-diabetics might be more suitable for RDN. Acknowledgement/Funding The Austrian Renal Denervation Registry was funded by the Austrian Society of Hypertension.

A Randomized Comparison of Pulmonary Vein Isolation With Versus Without Concomitant Renal Artery Denervation in Patients With Refractory Symptomatic Atrial Fibrillation and Resistant Hypertension

The renal nerves contribute to hypertension through effects in the kidney that enhance sodium retention and renin secretion, and by effects in the central nervous system that increase systemic sympathetic activity. Therefore, targeting the renal nerves provides a logical basis for treating hypertension. Several trials of renal denervation––achieved by applying radiofrequency energy through catheters placed in the renal arteries–– have been completed. Clinical results have been inconsistent, however, partly because of factors related to the ablation technique and partly because these studies have been performed in patients with the inadequately defined clinical condition of “treatment-resistant hypertension.” This statement now explains our conclusion that future studies of renal denervation should be guided by the established randomized, controlled clinical trial designs used for studying antihypertensive drugs and other treatments for hypertension. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

To investigate the effect of renal sympathetic denervation (RDN) on blood pressure and arterial stiffness in hypertensive beagles and explore the underlying mechanism. Sixteen beagles were randomly divided into RDN group (n=8, fed with a high-salt high-fat diet to establish models of hypertension and treated with RDN), sham-operated group (n=4, fed with a high-salt high-fat diet to induce hypertension but only examined with renal arteriography) and control group (n=4, fed with formula dog food). The changes in blood pressure, arterial stiffness, endothelial function, and sympathetic activity were compared among the 3 groups and correlation analysis was performed. All the animal models of hypertension were established successfully in the beagles. At 3 months after the RDN, the changes in systolic blood pressure (SBP) differed significantly among the 3 groups (P=0.006), and the reduction in SBP was significantly greater in RDN group than in the other two groups (P < 0.05). The variations of diastolic blood pressure (DBP) also differed significantly among the 3 groups (P=0.016), and DBP reduction was more obvious in RDN group than in the control group (P=0.007), but similar to that in the sham-operated group (P=0.052). The changes of resistance index (RI) after the procedure were significantly different among the 3 groups (P=0.043), and the RDN group showed a greater reduction of RI than the control group (P=0.032) and sham group (P=0.043). Serum levels of eNOS, NO and Ang Ⅱ did not differ significantly among the groups either before or after RDN (P>0.05), but serum NE level was significantly higher in RDN group than in the control groupafter successful modeling (P=0.014), but similar to that in the sham group (P=0.560). Compared with the sham operation, RDN in the hypertensive beagles resulted in a significantly greater decrease of serum NE level (P=0.032) to almost the control level (P= 0.080). The changes of RI following RDN were significantly correlated with the changes of SBP, DBP and serum levels of NO and NE (P < 0.05). RDN can significantly reduce blood pressure and improve arterial stiffness in hypertensive beagles possibly by reducing sympathetic activity and blood pressure and promoting NO synthesis.

the cumulative sodium retention. Furthermore, this renal denervation was shown to prevent, markedly attenuate or delay the development of hypertension in a diverse number of models of elevated blood pressure. 4 These promising experimental results of renal sympathetic nerve denervation for the treatment of hypertension prompted the establishment of the first clinical trial of this approach as a proof-of-principle study. 3 In brief, in 45 patients with resistant hypertension a catheter connected to a radiofrequency generator was introduced into renal arteries via femoral access and up to six discrete radiofrequency ablations were delivered within each renal artery. The major aims of this study were to assess firstly the efficacy of blood pressure lowering and s econdly the safety of this procedure. The initial blood pressure in these patients who had been treated with four to seven anti-hypertensive medications was 177/101 mmHg. The highly significant average reduction in office measured systolic/diastolic blood pressure at 1 month after the renal sympathetic denervation procedure was 14/10 mmHg. Blood pressure was further reduced at 3 months by 22/10 mmHg, with this effect persisting on s ubsequent assessments with the reduction 12 months after the procedure being 27/17 mmHg. Only six out of 45 patients did not benefit from this treatment, defined as a s ystolic blood pressure reduction of less than 10 mmHg. In 12 patients, 24 hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring was performed before and after the denervation procedure. The change in office systolic blood pressure correlated closely with the change in mean ambulatory blood pressure (r 2 50.62, p50.002). Furthermore, renal sympathetic denervation was associated with an increase in the number of n octurnal dippers in the group of patients that had responded to this treatment. The effectiveness of the radiofrequency method in achieving efferent renal denervation was assessed in a subgroup of patients (n 51 0) by measuring renal Arterial hypertension is a major risk factor for an array of cardiovascular diseases, particularly in the context of concomitant diabetes. Furthermore, elevated blood pressure is at least twice as prevalent in type 2 diabetes as in the g eneral population. Clinical data suggest that lower blood pressure may induce even greater cardiovascular benefits in diabetic subjects than in individuals without diabetes. With respect to renal disease, recent data from the Action in Diabetes and Vascular Disease (ADVANCE) study indicate that there is no lower threshold for blood pressure reduction when one is aiming to reduce the burden of renal disease. 1 So far, the major therapeutic strategy for arterial hypertension has focused on pharmacological treatments. Despite the abundance of available antihypertensive drugs, arterial hypertension remains undertreated, in particular in diabetes and specifically in the setting of associated chronic kidney disease. Clinical trials involving patients with diabetes or renal impairment have demonstrated that achieving lower blood pressure goals requires treatment with on average at least three different antihypertensive agents. 2 Moreover, it has been shown that with current standard antihypertensive therapies only one of out seven patients with type 2 diabetes can achieve a target blood pressure of less than 130/80 mmHg. Recently, a multi-centre prospective cohort study has demonstrated the efficacy of a non-pharmacological, minimally invasive percutaneous radiofrequency catheter-based treatment to disrupt renal sympathetic nerves in the management of patients with resistant hypertension, which included a significant subgroup with type 2 diabetes. 3 The rationale for renal sympathetic nerves denervation as a treatment strategy for systemic hypertension lies in the hypothesis that abnormal excretory function is crucial for the initiation, p rogression and maintenance of primary hypertension with sodium and water balance considered to be of central importance in the long-term control of systemic blood pressure. In addition, in animal models it has been confirmed that renal sympathetic nerve stimulation results in a substantial increase in the renin secretion rate and promotes antinatriuresis without affecting glomerular filtration rate and renal plasma flow. Moreover, in animal models renal sympathetic denervation has been used to demonstrate that renal sympathetic nerve activity is responsible for approximately 40% of

See related article, pp 450–456 In 2009, Krum et al1 reported a substantial blood pressure decrease (−27/17 mm Hg at 12 months) after percutaneous radiofrequency catheter-based renal sympathetic denervation in a cohort of 45 patients with resistant hypertension. One year later, the results of this proof-of-concept study were confirmed in 106 resistant hypertensive patients randomized 1:1 to renal denervation plus previous drug treatment versus drug treatment alone, with a blood pressure decrease of −32/12 mm Hg at 6 months in the renal denervation group ( P <0.0001), contrasting with virtually unchanged blood pressure in the control group (SYMPLICITY HTN-2).2 However, the SYMPLICITY studies have important limitations, addressed in detail elsewhere.3 Accordingly, there is a growing consensus that renal denervation should remain the ultima ratio in resistant hypertension3 and should only be administered by multidisciplinary teams in tertiary referral centres, after careful patient selection. Unfortunately, besides higher baseline systolic blood pressure and use of central sympatholytic agents,4 SYMPLICITY studies failed to identify independent predictors of blood pressure response after renal denervation. Therefore, patient selection is almost entirely based on negative criteria, such as exclusion of patients with secondary and white coat hypertension or with narrow or too short renal arteries. In individual cases, whether lack of blood pressure decrease after renal denervation is due to poor contribution of the sympathetic system to the pathogenesis or the maintenance of hypertension, …

Renal denervation in hypertension patients: Proceedings from an expert consensus roundtable cosponsored by SCAI and NKF.

Optimum and stepped care standardised antihypertensive treatment with or without renal denervation for resistant hypertension (DENERHTN): a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial

Rise in Blood Pressure Observed Among US Adults During the COVID-19 Pandemic

POS-413 MANAGEMENT OF HYPERTENSION AFTER RENAL SYMPATHETIC DENERVATION IN MALE PATIENTS

Blood pressure (BP) response to renal denervation (RDN) is highly variable and its effectiveness debated. A procedural end point for RDN may improve consistency of response. The objective of the current analysis was to look for the association between renal nerve stimulation (RNS)-induced BP increase before and after RDN and changes in ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) after RDN. Fourteen patients with drug-resistant hypertension referred for RDN were included. RNS was performed under general anesthesia at 4 sites in the right and left renal arteries, both before and immediately after RDN. RNS-induced BP changes were monitored and correlated to changes in ambulatory BP at a follow-up of 3 to 6 months after RDN. RNS resulted in a systolic BP increase of 50±27 mm Hg before RDN and systolic BP increase of 13±16 mm Hg after RDN (P<0.001). Average systolic ABPM was 153±11 mm Hg before RDN and decreased to 137±10 mm Hg at 3- to 6-month follow-up (P=0.003). Changes in RNS-induced BP increase before versus immediately after RDN and changes in ABPM before versus 3 to 6 months after RDN were correlated, both for systolic BP (R=0.77, P=0.001) and diastolic BP (R=0.79, P=0.001). RNS-induced maximum BP increase before RDN had a correlation of R=0.61 (P=0.020) for systolic and R=0.71 (P=0.004) for diastolic ABPM changes. RNS-induced BP changes before versus after RDN were correlated with changes in 24-hour ABPM 3 to 6 months after RDN. RNS should be tested as an acute end point to assess the efficacy of RDN and predict BP response to RDN.