Abstract
This study aims to evaluate the fracture strength of three-unit, implant-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) constructed from 3D-printed resin. It compares structures with and without fiber-reinforced composite (FRC) frameworks under conditions that mimic artificial aging. Forty FDPs were fabricated and divided into two groups: monolithic (n=20) and bi-layer (n=20). The monolithic group (MG) consisted entirely of FDPs made from 3D-printed resin for permanent restorations, while the bi-layer group (BG) featured FDPs with an FRC framework veneered with the same 3D-printed resin. Each group was subdivided into two subgroups: one subjected to artificial aging (MTG, n=10; BTG, n=10), and the other served as the baseline control (n=10). All subgroups underwent a mechanical bending test, applying a single load to failure using a universal testing machine. There was a statistically significant difference in fracture strength due to the presence of the FRC framework (p<0.01). The framework became the FDP more resistant to load. The mean load to failure and standard deviations were as follows: MG 406.59N (±33.84), MTG 286.20N (±152.15), BG 1142N (±162.88), and BTG 945N (±211.52). Although no statistical differences in strength were observed between aged and nonaged subgroups, variations in failure patterns emerged, with the BG and BTG groups showing a predominance of failures compared to the MG. The inclusion of an FRC framework significantly enhanced the fracture strength of the FDPs. While the aging protocol did not alter thestrength, failures predominantly occurred in the 3D-printed resin superstructure at the connectors. The highest rate of fractures occurred in the premolar connector.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Similar Papers
More From: Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.