Abstract

Research QuestionDoes an in-service training programme designed to address the attitudes of student officers, uniformed response officers and specialist rape crime investigators towards victims of rape change their perspective on adult victims, both male and female, who report rape offences?Data Police officers from four separate policing roles completed questionnaires designed to measure their attitudes towards victims of rape. The questions were already validated and used four specific subscales: ‘Asked for it’, ‘Didn’t mean to’, ‘It wasn’t really rape’ and ‘S/he lied’. Two questionnaires, one focused on male victims and one on females, were administered at different points in time.MethodsThis randomised controlled trial used a block design, randomly assigning eligible police officers to treatment and control conditions within each of four groups. Participants were grouped as rape detectives (N = 40), uniformed response officers in urban areas (N = 50); uniformed response officers in rural areas (N = 50) and student officers (N = 53). Officers in the treatment condition undertook a bespoke training programme, based on an online College of Policing e-learning programme, enhanced with audio and video content, discussion groups and short online webinar sessions delivered by a psychologist specialising in sexual offending. Both groups were surveyed before and after the treatment group was trained.FindingsThe training programme resulted in positive attitude changes towards male and female rape victims when responses are combined across all four police groups (but not within all groups separately) compared with the attitudes of those who did not undertake the training. Effects were found for both levels of rape myth acceptance and assessment of victim credibility. The effect was largest for the subscales ‘S/he lied’ and ‘it wasn’t really rape’. Training had more effect on attitudes towards female victims than towards males and more effect on uniformed response officers than on other categories of officers.ConclusionThe use of this mixed online webinar and in-person discussion group training delivery was effective in changing attitudes towards rape victims on issues relating to the treatment of people who report being raped.

Highlights

  • Rape is a paradox because, so often, victims are blamed for the offence (Maier 2014)

  • An estimated 15% of rape victims report the crime to the police (Ministry of Justice 2013), though even this figure should be interpreted cautiously

  • These factors are connected to problematic assumptions about what constitutes a ‘typical rape’ and the likely behaviour of victims and perpetrators. These attitudes are often referred to collectively as ‘rape myths’ (Maier 2014), which distort the antecedents and consequences of the act. Addressing these attitudes and beliefs may contribute to closing the ‘justice gap’ (Temkin and Krahe 2008) for victims of rape

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Rape is a paradox because, so often, victims are blamed for the offence (Maier 2014). Among the most common reasons victims do not report rape, two stand out: selfblaming attitudes and victim belief that others would blame the them (Grubb and Turner 2012) These factors are connected to problematic assumptions about what constitutes a ‘typical rape’ and the likely behaviour of victims and perpetrators. These attitudes are often referred to collectively as ‘rape myths’ (Maier 2014), which distort the antecedents and consequences of the act. Addressing these attitudes and beliefs may contribute to closing the ‘justice gap’ (Temkin and Krahe 2008) for victims of rape

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.