Abstract

BackgroundBounceback policies for readmitted patients are commonly used by hospitals in the U.S., but to date there have been no studies of their impact on patient care or outcomes. In July 2011, a large, tertiary-care, academic medical center introduced a stronger bounceback policy for readmitted patients cared for by the resident service. The primary objective of this study was to determine the impact of the policy on readmission rates, length of stay (LOS), and LOS index. The secondary objective was to assess the effect of time within clinical rotations on the same outcomes. MethodsThis retrospective cohort study included patients admitted to the resident and hospitalist medicine services from 6/15/09 to 6/16/13. Total number of hospitalizations analyzed was 66,118. Measures included 30-day readmission rates, LOS, and adjusted LOS index. Covariates included time within clinical rotation and patient-level characteristics. The hospitalist service was used as a control group. ResultsAfter the policy was implemented, the resident service had an 8% lower relative risk ratio of 30-day readmission compared to the hospitalist service (p =.05). There was no significant different in LOS or LOS index. LOS for patients on the resident service exhibited a weekly pattern, with LOS lowest on Mondays and increasing throughout the week. ConclusionsA stronger bounceback policy resulted in a small decrease in 30-day readmission rates without increasing LOS. ImplicationsBounceback policies may be an effective and low-cost tool to reduce readmissions by leveraging non-financial incentives to change physicians’ behavior.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.