Abstract
Peritonectomy and cytoreductive surgery with or without HIPEC (hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy) has been performed with some impressive results in patients with PC in slow growing GI tumours [6]. Patients with PC secondary to gastric cancer have been shown to have a median survival of up to 12 months with complete cytoreduction [7]. However, complete cytoreduction is often not possible and this technique carries significant morbidity and mortality. Thus non-operative techniques which give a similar median survival are preferable. The median survival from diagnosis in the study by Strohlein et al. [1] was 16.7 months for the catumaxomab group which compares very favourably with their control group (6 months) and with the literature. Catumaxomab is a monoclonal antibody targeted against epithelial cell adhesion molecule (Ep-CAM) on the tumour cell which is expressed on over 90% of epithelial cancers [8]. This high expression makes such a target very attractive especially compared to other biological targets. Ep-CAM is expressed on normal epithelial cells baso-laterally and is shielded by tight junctions that limit its accessibility [9]. Due to the fact that the peritoneal cavity is lined with mesothelium, the only cells expressing Ep-CAM in the peritoneal cavity will be tumour cells, thus making the intraperitoneal route ideal for administration of catumaxomab and PC the ideal disease target. The decrease in the number of Ep-CAM positive tumour cells in the peritoneal lavage samples and the lack of progression to malignant ascites, give additional evidence of tumour response in the current study. Catumaxomab does cause a cytokine release syndrome with activation of IL-6, TNF a and other cytokines. This explains the majority of adverse events seen, which are broadly similar to that seen in the phase II/III randomized trial of malignant ascites [10] despite the slightly higher final dose in this PC study. One of the main factors limiting the use of catumaxomab in the malignant ascites trial was that the condition of many patients had deteriorated such that their Karnovski performance score was less than 60 by the time they had completed conventional chemotherapy and had reaccumulated The study by Strohlein et al. [1] in this issue of OnkOlOgie evaluates a new potential treatment for peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC). PC is a significant problem in gastrointestinal (GI) cancer, particularly gastric cancer. It is caused by the transcoelomic spread of cancer and can occur with or without evidence of metastasis via other routes. It is a sign of advanced malignancy and is usually associated with a poor prognosis commonly progressing to bowel obstruction or malignant ascites [2]. There have been a number of staging systems for classifying PC but the most commonly used is that described by Gilly and co-workers that classifies PC by size of nodules and distribution within the peritoneal cavity [3]. This staging system was used in the EVOCAPE 1 study by Sadeghi and colleagues where 370 patients were followed after diagnosis of PC at open surgery and was shown to be an important prognostic indicator [2]. 22 out of 24 patients in Strohlein’s study had advanced PC according to the Gilly classification and therefore would be expected to have a poor survival. The prognosis of patients with PC secondary to GI cancer is poor: in the EVOCAPE 1 study the mean and median survivals were 6 and 3.1 months, respectively. Median survival is tumour dependent with the main tumour groups of gastric, colorectal and pancreatic cancers having median survivals of 3.1, 5.2 and 2.1 months respectively. An earlier study, by Chu and colleagues, of 100 patients were prospectively studied with colorectal cancer being the most common primary tumour and both gastric and pancreatic cancers being associated with the worst prognosis particularly when associated with ascites [4]. In the laparoscopic era, staging laparoscopy is commonly performed in upper GI cancers to prevent unnecessary open and close procedures in patients with PC secondary to gastric, pancreatic and oesophageal adenocarcinomas. A recent study looking at survival of gastric and oesophageal cancer patients found to have PC at laparoscopy who did not proceed to surgical resection showed that patients with overt PC survived a median of 9 months when receiving chemotherapy compared to 6 months in those who did not [5].
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.