Imaging FRET standards by steady‐state fluorescence and lifetime methods

Abstract

Imaging fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) between molecules labeled with fluorescent proteins is emerging as a powerful tool to study changes in ions, ligands, and molecular interactions in their physiological cellular environment. Different methods use either steady-state fluorescence properties or lifetime to quantify the FRET rate. In addition, some provide the absolute FRET efficiency whereas others are simply a relative index very much influenced by the actual settings and instrumentation used, which makes the interpretation of a given FRET rate very difficult. The use and exchange of FRET standards in laboratories using these techniques would help to overcome this drawback. We report here the construction and systematic evaluation of FRET standard probes of varying FRET efficiencies. The standards for intramolecular FRET were protein fusions of the cyan and yellow variants of A. victoria green fluorescent protein (ECFP and citrine) joined by short linkers or larger protein spacers, or ECFP tagged with a tetracysteine motif and labeled with the biarsenical fluorochrome, FlAsH. Negative and positive controls of intermolecular FRET were also used. We compared these FRET standards with up to four FRET quantification methods: ratioing of acceptor to donor emission, donor intensity recovery upon acceptor photobleach, sensitized emission after spectral unmixing of raw images, and fluorescence lifetime imaging (FLIM). The latter was obtained with a frequency-domain setup able to provide high quality lifetime images in less than a second, and is thus very well suited for live cell studies. The FRET rates or indexes of the standards were in good agreement regardless of the method used. For the CFP-tetraCys/FlAsH pair, the rate calculated from CFP quenching was faster than that obtained by FLIM.