Abstract
Two measures of fluoroscopic image quality-high-contrast video spatial resolution and low-contrast video resolution-were assessed in 64 interventional cardiology catheterization laboratories. The results of high-contrast spatial resolution testing indicate variable levels of performance with median values of 1.5, 2.0, and 2.5 line pairs/mm at the three levels of magnification. The results of the low-contrast video resolution testing indicate clinically relevant limitations in performance. This was particularly true when testing was performed in a dynamic mode under simulated large patient conditions. Under these conditions, 50% of systems failed to detect a wire of diameter 0.017". In addition, limited system dynamic range was identified in a substantial fraction of laboratories and may contribute to these important variations in performance. Taken together, these findings serve to characterize overall system performance in the current era of interventional cardiology and reaffirm the continued need for image quality assessment programs.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
