Image quality and radiation dose assessment of Thai-made 2D and 3D dental extraoral imaging scanners.

Authors' response.

C-arm Cone-beam CT: General Principles and Technical Considerations for Use in Interventional Radiology

Intraprocedural imaging: Flat panel detectors, rotational angiography, FluoroCT, IVUS, or still the portable C-arm?

3D cone-beam CT of the ankle using a novel twin robotic X-ray system: Assessment of image quality and radiation dose

This study compared image quality and radiation dose between cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) under equivalent scanning settings, focusing on postoperative imaging after upper extremity osteosynthesis. A distal radius plate was implanted in a cadaveric forearm to simulate postoperative conditions. A total of twenty-four scans were performed using both modalities. Radiation dose was quantified with seven dosimeters placed at various anatomical locations and scan parameters were adjusted to ensure comparability. Subjective image quality was evaluated by five independent radiologists, while objective image quality was assessed using signal-to-noise ratio and contrast-to-noise ratio. Significant differences were found in radiation exposure and image quality. CBCT showed a slightly higher radiation dose (dose-length product: CBCT, 56.97 mGy*cm; MDCT, 46.19 mGy*cm; p < 0.0001). No significant difference was observed in cortical bone assessment (p = 0.28), but CBCT was rated higher for cancellous bone visualization (p = 0.005), artifact reduction (p = 0.003), and overall image quality (p = 0.009). Objectively, CBCT demonstrated lower image noise with superior signal-to-noise ratio (p = 0.0004) and contrast-to-noise ratio (p < 0.0001). This research offers a direct comparison of CBCT and MDCT using matched scan parameters on the same anatomical specimen, providing practical insights into image quality and radiation dose for optimizing postoperative orthopedic imaging protocols. CBCT demonstrates advantages in bone imaging and artifact management, while MDCT has superior potential for radiation dose reduction without compromising image quality.

There has been an increase in the use of interventional neuroradiology procedures because of their non-invasiveness compared to surgeries and the improved image quality of fluoroscopy, digital subtraction angiography, and rotational angiography. Although cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images are inferior to multi-detector CT images in terms of low-contrast detectability and lower radiation doses, CBCT scans are frequently performed because of their accessibility. This study aimed to evaluate the image quality and radiation dose of two different high-resolution CBCTs (HR CBCT): conventional (C-HR CBCT) and wide-field HR CBCT (W-HR CBCT). The modulation transfer function (MTF), noise power spectrum (NPS), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were used to evaluate the image quality. On comparing the MTF of C-HR CBCT with a 256 × 256 matrix and that of W-HR CBCT with a 384 × 384 matrix, the MTF of W-HR CBCT with the 384 × 384 matrix was larger. A comparison of the NPS and CNR of C-HR CBCT with a 256 × 256 matrix and W-HR CBCT with a 384 × 384 matrix showed that both values were comparable. The reference air kerma values were equal for C-HR CBCT and W-HR CBCT; however, the value of the kerma area product was 1.44 times higher for W-HR CBCT compared to C-HR CBCT. The W-HR CBCT allowed for improved spatial resolution while maintaining the image noise and low-contrast detectability by changing the number of image matrices from 256 × 256 to 384 × 384. Our study revealed the image characteristics and radiation dose of W-HR CBCT. Given its advantages of low-contrast detectability and wide-area imaging with high spatial resolution, W-HR CBCT may be useful in interventional neuroradiology for acute ischemic stroke.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to assess image quality and radiation dose of a novel twin robotic x-ray system's 3D cone-beam CT (CBCT) function for the depiction of cadaveric wrists. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Sixteen cadaveric wrists were scanned using dedicated low-dose and standard-dose CBCT protocols as well as clinical MDCT for comparison. Three readers assessed overall image quality, noise, and artifacts in bone and soft tissue on 5-point Likert scales. For radiation dose analysis, volume CT dose indexes (CTDIvol) were compared. RESULTS. Overall image quality of most studies was very good or excellent in MDCT (for readers 1, 2, and 3: 100%, 100%, and 88%, respectively), standard-dose CBCT (100%, 100%, and 94%), and low dose CBCT (100%, 94%, and 88%) with two readers favoring standard-dose CBCT over MDCT image quality (readers 1 and 2; p ≤ 0.046). In soft tissue, standard-dose (readers 1, 2, and 3; p ≤ 0.021) and low-dose (all p ≤ 0.001) CBCT images had more noise than MDCT in all cases. Standard-dose (all p ≤ 0.003) and low-dose (all p < 0.001) CBCT images also displayed more artifacts. In osseous tissue, one reader observed more noise (p < 0.001) and artifacts (p = 0.020) for low-dose CBCT than for MDCT, whereas no difference was found between standard-dose CBCT and MDCT. Mean CTDIvol was significantly lower for standard-dose (5.2 ± 0.6 mGy; p < 0.001) and low-dose CBCT (1.8 ± 0.2 mGy; p < 0.001) than for clinical MDCT without automatic dose modulation (15.0 ± 0.0 mGy). CONCLUSION. The tested CBCT function delivers suitable image quality for clinical wrist imaging at significantly lower radiation levels than conventional MDCT. In combination with comfortable positioning options and the ability to perform additional radiographic and fluoroscopic examinations, the twin robotic x-ray system may hold the potential to be a one-stop shop device for trauma-associated wrist imaging.

To evaluate image quality and radiation dose of a state of the art cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) system and a multislice computed tomography (MSCT) system in patients with sinonasal poliposis. In this retrospective study two radiologists evaluated 57 patients with sinonasal poliposis who underwent a CBCT or MSCT sinus examination, along with a control group of 90 patients with normal radiological findings. Tissue doses were measured using a phantom model with thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD). Overall image quality in CBCT was scored significantly higher than in MSCT in patients with normal radiologic findings (p-value: 0.00001). In patients with sinonasal poliposis, MSCT scored significantly higher than CBCT (p-value: 0.00001). The average effective dose for MSCT was 42% higher compared to CBCT (108 μSv vs 63 μSv). CBCT and MSCT are both suited for the evaluation of sinonasal poliposis. In patients with sinonasal poliposis, clinically important structures of the paranasal sinuses can be better delineated with MSCT, whereas in patients without sinonasal poliposis, CBCT turns out to define the important structures of the sinonasal region better. However, given the lower radiation dose, CBCT can be considered for the evaluation of the sinonasal structures in patients with sinonasal poliposis. • CBCT and MSCT are both suited for evaluation of sinonasal poliposis. • Effective dose for MSCT was 42% higher compared to CBCT. • In patients with sinonasal poliposis, clinically important anatomical structures are better delineated with MSCT. • In patients with normal radiological findings, clinically important anatomical structures are better delineated with CBCT.

The primary objectives of this pilot study were to evaluate the radiation dose, breast coverage, and image quality of cone-beam breast CT compared with a conventional mammographic examination. Image quality analysis was focused on the concordance of cone-beam breast CT with conventional mammography in terms of mammographic findings. This prospective study was performed from July 2006 through August 2008. Twenty-three women were enrolled who met the inclusion criteria, which were age 40 years or older with final BI-RADS assessment category 1 or 2 lesions on conventional mammograms within the previous 6 months. The breasts were imaged with a flat-panel detector-based cone-beam CT system, and the images were reviewed with a 3D visualization system. Cone-beam breast CT image data sets and the corresponding mammograms were reviewed by three qualified mammographers. The parameters assessed and compared in this pilot study were radiation dose, breast tissue coverage, and image quality, including detectability of masses and calcifications. The mammograms and cone-beam breast CT images were independently reviewed side by side, and the reviewers were not blinded to the other technique. The observed agreement and Cohen's kappa were used to evaluate agreement between the mammographic and cone-beam breast CT findings and interobserver agreement. Each subject responded to a questionnaire on multiple parameters, including comfort of the cone-beam breast CT examination compared with mammography. For a conventional mammographic examination, the average glandular radiation dose ranged from 2.2 to 15 mGy (mean, 6.5 [SD, 2.9] mGy). For cone-beam breast CT, the average glandular dose ranged from 4 to 12.8 mGy (mean, 8.2 [SD, 1.4] mGy). The average glandular dose from cone-beam breast CT was generally within the range of that from conventional mammography. For heterogeneously dense and extremely dense breasts, the difference between the mean dose of conventional mammography and that of cone-beam breast CT was not statistically significant (7.0 vs 8.1 mGy, p = 0.06). Breast tissue coverage was statistically significantly better with cone-beam breast CT than with mammography in the lateral (p < 0.0001), medial (p < 0.0001), and posterior (p = 0.0002) aspects. Mammography had statistically significantly better coverage than cone-beam breast CT in the axilla and axillary tail (p < 0.0001). Overall, most calcifications and all masses detected with mammography were also detected with cone-beam breast CT. The interobserver agreement on cone-beam breast CT was 83.7% in the detectability of imaging findings. The overall interobserver agreement on type of findings, size of findings (<1, 1-4.99, and > or = 5 mm), and location of findings was 77.2%, 84.8%, and 78.3%, respectively. The results of this study show that cone-beam breast CT can be used to image the entire breast from chest wall to nipple with sufficient spatial and contrast resolution for detection of masses and calcifications at a radiation dose within the range of that of conventional mammography.

In CT scanning, image quality has many components and is influenced by many technical parameters. While image quality has always been a concern for the physics community, clinically acceptable image quality has become even more of an issue as strategies to reduce radiation dose — to all patients, but especially to pediatric patients— has become a focus in many radiology practices.The purpose of this presentation will be to first describe several of the components of CT image quality — noise, slice thickness (Z‐axis resolution), low contrast resolution and high contrast resolution— as well as radiation dose and to describe how each of these may be affected by technical parameter selection. This presentation will pay particular attention to the tradeoffs that exist between different aspects of image quality, especially when the reduction of radiation dose is one of the objectives.The presentation will then explore several mechanisms that can be used to reduce radiation dose in CT exams and the implications for the diagnostic image quality of the exam. Specifically, the implications of varying the tube current*time product (mAs), pitch or tablespeed (or for axial imaging, the table increment), slice thickness, beam energy (kVp), patient (or phantom) size and dose reduction options (such as tube current modulation) will be described for both radiation dose and diagnostic image quality. Finally, this presentation will emphasize that the tradeoffs between radiation dose and image quality are clinical‐task dependent; that is, the goals of the clinically indicated exam dictate what aspect of image quality may be emphasized for that exam (low contrast resolution or high contrast spatial resolution, etc.) and this will have implications for the amount of radiation dose reduction that is acceptable. This will be illustrated with examples from selected diagnostic imaging exams.Educational Objectives:1. Understand key components of image quality in CT scanning as well as reinforce CT radiation dose concepts.2. Understand the impact that technical parameter selection has on the various aspects of image quality and radiation dose.3. Examine the tradeoffs between various aspects of image quality and radiation dose.4. Examine the impact of these tradeoffs on a few clinical imaging protocols and illustrate the task‐dependence of image quality requirements.

To assess visualization tasks using cone-beam CT (CBCT) compared to multi-detector CT (MDCT) for musculoskeletal extremity imaging. Ten cadaveric hands and ten knees were examined using a dedicated CBCT prototype and a clinical multi-detector CT using nominal protocols (80 kVp-108mAs for CBCT; 120 kVp- 300 mAs for MDCT). Soft tissue and bone visualization tasks were assessed by four radiologists using five-point satisfaction (for CBCT and MDCT individually) and five-point preference (side-by-side CBCT versus MDCT image quality comparison) rating tests. Ratings were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, and observer agreement was assessed using the Kappa-statistic. Knee CBCT images were rated "excellent" or "good" (median scores 5 and 4) for "bone" and "soft tissue" visualization tasks. Hand CBCT images were rated "excellent" or "adequate" (median scores 5 and 3) for "bone" and "soft tissue" visualization tasks. Preference tests rated CBCT equivalent or superior to MDCT for bone visualization and favoured the MDCT for soft tissue visualization tasks. Intraobserver agreement for CBCT satisfaction tests was fair to almost perfect (κ ~ 0.26-0.92), and interobserver agreement was fair to moderate (κ ~ 0.27-0.54). CBCT provided excellent image quality for bone visualization and adequate image quality for soft tissue visualization tasks. • CBCT provided adequate image quality for diagnostic tasks in extremity imaging. • CBCT images were "excellent" for "bone" and "good/adequate" for "soft tissue" visualization tasks. • CBCT image quality was equivalent/superior to MDCT for bone visualization tasks.

Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) has become increasingly popular in dental and maxillofacial imaging due to its accurate 3D information, minimal radiation dose, and low machine cost. In this paper, we propose the newly developed mobile CBCT scanner which combines the benefits of CBCT and mobility to extend its applications to head and neck imaging and allow faster access to a patient at various clinical sites. With the large area detector, only a single rotation is needed to reconstruct the field-of-view of almost the entire head. Our filtered back-projection reconstruction and artifact reduction algorithms were based on a graphics processing unit to speed up the calculations. The quantitative performance was evaluated in terms of radiation doses and image quality. The radiation doses were measured using both CT dose index and dose area product (DAP) and compared with other CBCT and multi-slice CT (MSCT) machines. Then, we analyzed image quality using the standard cone-beam phantom. The effective doses radiated from the proposed mobile CBCT machine were within the range of 0.1–0.2 mSv, while the normalized DAP measurements were within the range of 46–144 mGy cm2, which are significantly below the achievable dose of 250 mGy cm2. The overall image quality of the proposed scanner was mostly comparable to other MSCT and CBCT scanners. Geometric accuracy of the reconstructed images provided the errors less than 0.16 mm or 0.12%. Due to low radiation dose, high accuracy and adequate image quality as compared to others, the proposed mobile CBCT has high potential for diagnosis and treatment planning in head and neck applications.

Purpose: A novel electromagnetic tracking system is being used for real‐time tracking during treatment delivery. On board cone‐beam CT imaging is routinely being used for real‐time imaging and localization. Concurrent use of these two modalities might prove beneficial for correlating imaging and tracking information. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of the presence of the electromagnetic tracking system on the CBCT image quality. Method and Materials: A commercial CT performance phantom (Catphan, Phantom Laboratory, Salem, NY) containing various image quality assessment tools was imaged using a kilovoltage on‐board cone‐beam CT system (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto). An electromagnetic tracking system (Calypso® 4D Localization System, Calypso Medical, Seattle, WA) uses an electromagnetic array for tracking transponder positions. The imaging quality assessment phantom was imaged with and without the electromagnetic tracking system in place. To quantify the effect on the image quality, the CT number accuracy, spatial integrity, image uniformity, high and low contrast resolution were compared. Results: CT number accuracy, spatial linearity and high contrast resolution were unaffected by the presence of the array. The visibility of the 1% cylindrical low contrast resolution targets was 15 mm and 7 mm for with and without the array respectively. The inherent streaking artifacts degraded the low contrast image quality significantly.Conclusion: Presence of an electromagnetic array significantly degrades CBCT low contrast resolution while other image performance parameters are minimally affected. For imaging human anatomy, algorithms to improve image quality may need to be developed. Conflict of Interest: This work is supported in part from a grant from Calypso Medical Systems.

To investigate the accuracy and reliability of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) measurements of buccal alveolar bone height (BBH) and thickness (BBT) using custom acquisition settings. School of Dentistry, Oregon Health & Science University. Twelve embalmed cadavers. Cadaver heads were imaged by CBCT (i-CAT® 17-19, Imaging Sciences International, Hatfield, PA) using a 'long scan' (LS) setting with 619 projection images, 360° revolution, 26.9 s duration, and 0.2 mm voxel size, and using a 'short scan' (SS) setting with 169 projection images, 180° rotation, 4.8 s duration, and 0.3 mm voxel size. BBH and BBT were measured with 65 teeth, indirectly from CBCT images and directly through dissection. Comparisons were assessed using paired t-tests (p≤0.05). Level of agreement was assessed by concordance correlation coefficients, Pearson's correlation coefficients, and Bland-Altman plots. Mean differences in measurements compared to direct measurements were as follows, LS 0.17±0.12 (BBH) and 0.10±0.07 mm (BBT), and SS 0.41±0.32 (BBH) and 0.12±0.11 mm (BBT). No statistical differences were found with any of BBH or BBT measurements. Correlation coefficients and Bland-Altman plots showed agreement was high between direct and indirect measurement methods, although agreement was stronger for measurements of BBH than BBT. Compared to the LS, the similarity in results with the reduced scan times and hence reduced effective radiation dose, favors use of shorter scans, unless other purposes for higher resolution imaging can be defined.

The Image Gently in Dentistry campaign: promotion of responsible use of maxillofacial radiology in dentistry for children.