Abstract
of the numerous criticisms that he levels against my work. Not a single one of his arguments weakens in any way the force of my findings. The discussion proceeds as follows. Part I summarizes the prin-cipal claims made in my original article. Part II responds to the six sets of objections (each of which contains many independent com-ponents) that Chief Judge Edwards levels against my methodology. Part III takes issue with arguments advanced by Chief Judge Ed-wards in support of his account of how the D.C. Circuit decides cases. Part IV explains why Chief Judge Edwards’ views concerning the role of empirical studies of the judicial function are misguided.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
