Identifying barriers to equality and diversity within the trainee advanced practitioner workforce.

With an increasingly growing ageing population who require assessment and on-going management of their complex healthcare needs, nursing as a profession has grown and evolved to meet these demands. Part of the changes in the nursing workforce include the development of advanced practice and the nurse practitioner role. The advanced practice role is now well established with evidence to demonstrate its effectiveness (Aitkenhead & Lee, 2019; Jennings, Lee, Chao, & Keating, 2009; Jennings et al., 2008; Lee et al., 2018; Lee et al., 2014). Advanced practice roles require advanced clinical assessment skills and the application of complex reasoning and critical thinking. Advanced practitioners make complex clinical decisions applying these advanced knowledge and skills for each patient consultation and they work closely in collaboration with colleagues that include physicians and allied health professionals.

To report a study designed comparing the roles, responsibilities, and perceived outcomes of Clinical Nurse Specialists, Clinical Midwife Specialists, and Advanced Nurse Practitioners in Ireland. A clinical career pathway that encompasses progression from staff nurse or midwife through clinical specialist to advanced practitioner level was introduced in Ireland in 2000. Such roles are common internationally, but little evaluation has been conducted and few comparisons have been made between roles. A mixed-method case-study design was used. Following Research Ethics Committee Approval, data were collected in 2009-2010, using non-participant observation (92hours) of 23 Clinical Specialists and Advanced Practitioners, interviews with 21 clinicians and 13 Directors of Nursing or Midwifery. A survey was completed by 154 service-users. A clear difference was seen between Clinical Specialist and Advanced Practitioners, with advanced practice roles providing improved service delivery, greater clinical and professional leadership, increased research, and a clear governance and accreditation structure. Clinical Midwife Specialists were rated at a similar level to Advanced Nurse Practitioners for certain aspects and rated more highly for 'continuity of care and carer'. Advanced Practitioners do give a higher level of care, particularly at a strategic level. Existing Clinical Specialists should therefore be encouraged to develop their skills and education to achieve advanced practice level and more specialist and advanced practice posts should be instituted.

Aim and ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to investigate current advanced practice Masters students’ experience of clinical supervision, to explore how clinical supervision works in practice and to identify students’ perceptions of the facilitators and barriers to clinical supervision in their workplace.BackgroundAdvanced practitioners, and in particular nurses, play a pivotal role in delivering health care across acute and primary care settings. These non‐medical professionals fulfil a rapidly expanding proportion of roles traditionally undertaken by medically qualified staff within the National Health Service in the United Kingdom and often lead specialist clinics and services. To prepare for the advanced practice role, individuals are required to undertake a Master's in advanced practice to develop the required skills and knowledge and work in clinical practice with a clinical assessor/supervisor to demonstrate competence and performance.DesignA mixed method study using an online descriptive cross‐sectional survey and qualitative data were collected via focus groups and has been reported using the Good Reporting of a Mixed Methods Study checklist.ResultsA total of 79 students completed the online survey (from 145 AP students), a response rate of 55%. Most respondents were nurses (n = 73) with 49 (62%) in a formal advanced practice trainee role, and the majority believed their clinical supervisor had a good understanding of advanced practice and the advanced practice role. Two focus groups were held with 16 participants in total. Thematic analysis revealed five themes: (a) perceived level and amount of support from clinical supervisors, (b) skill level of clinical supervisors, (c) physicians and their perceptions on supervising, Advanced practitioners (d) clinical supervisors’ preparation for the role and (e) transition from trainee to qualified advanced practitioner.ConclusionThe survey revealed that advanced practitioner students perceived that clinical supervisors and workplace colleagues had a good understanding of the advanced practice role with good levels of support in practice. A more coherent approach is required for clinical supervision and an implementation framework that can be formally evaluated.Relevance to clinical practiceSeveral significant barriers to clinical supervision for advanced practitioner students were identified, and there are currently more barriers (including COVID‐19) than facilitators.

A critical review of the development of advanced practice competency frameworks and their contribution to autonomous practice

Uptake of advanced clinical practice roles in the health service in England: Perspectives at the micro level

Background: Despite the significant input from Heath Education England (HEE), now NHS England (NHSE), there are still significant variations around advanced practice programmes, support and training, particularly in less developed areas such as mental health, community posts and primary care. To help target these areas, and to support the NHS Long Term Plan (2023) to increase the number of advanced clinical practitioners (ACPs), the Faculty of Advanced Practice South Yorkshire recruited three ACP leads from mental health, community, and primary care backgrounds to establish a support project led by one professional lead. These leads were able to utilise their lived experience of completing the ACP MSc programme and working as an ACP to help trainee advanced clinical practitioners (tACPs) navigate their journey. The ACP leads also developed a variety of educational events, which further supported the trainees' needs. Aim: This article reports the feedback given via an online questionnaire from trainees that accessed the project, which ended in March 2024. Its aim is to highlight the often-undervalued concept of using clinicians personal experience regarding advanced training and practice, to mentor, support and ultimately retain the future ACP workforce. Methods: An email with a link to a questionnaire was sent to 128 tACPs or recently qualified ACPs that had applied for their training via the Faculty of Advanced Practice South Yorkshire. The questionnaire, created in Microsoft Forms, was completed anonymously, and produced both numerical and free-text data. The questionnaire solicited feedback around: the number of contacts they had and how they contacted; the ACP leads; types of support accessed; and the educational events available. Free text answers were analysed by the author (CJ) and a second reviewer (SF) to generate a consensus on themes. Results: A total of 64 clinicians responded, of which 43 were tACPs, 10 were ACPs, five had other job titles (community matron, pharmacist, practice nurse) and five did not state what their job title was. Responses suggest that the support accessed from the project was highly beneficial and could not be gained elsewhere. A key factor in the project's success was the ACP leads' lived experience of having previously completed advanced practice training, as well as their ability to tailor learning events to the trainees' needs. Conclusion: Meeting the demands of ACP training in areas where the role is less established remains an ongoing challenge. It seems some of these challenges relate to the lack of practical support being provided by employers or higher education institutions, such as lived experience of completing the task of ACP training. Support projects, like the one discussed in this article, appear aptly placed to help fulfil these needs and begs the question ‘why aren't there more?’, especially when advanced practitioners are fundamental to the future healthcare workforce.

People from ethnic minority backgrounds in the UK have been disproportionately affected by coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), with higher death rates and suboptimal health outcomes compared with those from white ethnic backgrounds. This trend is reflected in healthcare staff from ethnic minority backgrounds, including nurses, who are disproportionately affected by COVID-19 and have higher death rates from the disease. The theory of intersectionality contends that social categorisations such as gender, race and class can contribute to discrimination and result in disadvantages. In this article, the authors outline several intersecting factors that could be contributing to the disproportionate effects of COVID-19 among nurses from ethnic minority backgrounds, as well as making recommendations for further research in this area.

The aim was to interview new entrants to a Master's level programme of educational preparation for advanced healthcare practice roles. The objectives were to gain an understanding of their issues and concerns as they looked ahead to their future development and to illuminate issues concerning their experiences as students and as employees. As advanced practice roles become more widespread in the United Kingdom and abroad, nurses and other healthcare professionals are becoming more involved in innovation and service development and experiencing greater autonomy in many areas, particularly in regard to clinical examination and diagnosis. A qualitative design was employed to illuminate issues and concerns of new students on a Master's degree programme of educational preparation for advanced healthcare practitioners. Two focus group interviews were conducted in 2004. Sixteen students from two programme cohorts participated in the two groups. Two main themes were outlined. These were: 'opportunities for development' and 'time pressures'. Subcategories within these two themes are also discussed. Students undertaking Master's level preparation for advanced healthcare practitioner roles perceive personal and professional benefits and opportunities to develop innovative services to improve patient care as accruing from the programme. These opportunities and benefits were related to the United Kingdom national health policy agenda. Some role difficulties were experienced. The additional burdens that the programme of study provided were an issue for some, but these were perceived as a temporary problem, worth undergoing for the likely long-term benefits. Students undertaking educational preparation for advanced practice roles see themselves as innovators, specifically aiming to develop and improve aspects of service provision. Education for advanced practice roles should not be undertaken lightly, but can equip students with various skills, particularly regarding clinical assessment, and these skills should underpin practitioners' autonomy.

Harnessing competence and confidence: Dimensions in education and development for advanced and consultant practice

Professions grapple with defining advanced practice and the characteristics of advanced practitioners. In nursing and allied health, advanced practice has been defined as ‘a state of professional maturity in which the individual demonstrates a level of integrated knowledge, skill and competence that challenges the accepted boundaries of practice and pioneers new developments in health care’. Evolution of advanced practice in Australia has been slower than in the United Kingdom, mainly due to differences in demography, the health system and industrial relations. This article describes a conceptual model of advanced practitioner characteristics in the medical radiation professions, taking into account experiences in other countries and professions. Using the CanMEDS framework, the model includes foundation characteristics of communication, collaboration and professionalism, which are fundamental to advanced clinical practice. Gateway characteristics are: clinical expertise, with high level competency in a particular area of clinical practice; scholarship and teaching, including a masters qualification and knowledge dissemination through educating others; and evidence-based practice, with judgements made on the basis of research findings, including research by the advanced practitioner. The pinnacle of advanced practice is clinical leadership, where the practitioner has a central role in the health care team, with the capacity to influence decision making and advocate for others, including patients. The proposed conceptual model is robust yet adaptable in defining generic characteristics of advanced practitioners, no matter their clinical specialty. The advanced practice roles that evolve to meet future health service demand must focus on the needs of patients, local populations and communities.

Stakeholders' interpretations and responses to research as a feature of advanced practice: A scoping review

BackgroundGlaucoma is the second leading cause of irreversible blindness. The iStent® Inject trabecular micro-bypass is a type of minimally invasive surgery that may effectively manage IOP and reduce dependence on...

The number of advanced practice roles in the Australian health-care system is growing alongside contemporary health-care reforms. The present study aimed to evaluate the impact of introducing novel advanced practice dietitian roles in gastrostomy tube (g-tube) management and develop a competency framework for progressing opportunities in dietetics practice and policy. A questionnaire was distributed to service lead dietitians at six participating health-care networks at the completion of a dedicated advanced practice funding grant, and at 12-month follow up. Service changes (e.g. number of dietitians credentialed, service and adverse events, change in patient waiting times and staff satisfaction), enablers and barriers for the implementation of the novel roles (including pre-, during, and post-implementation), and clinical costing estimates to measure the financial impact on the health system were investigated. Participant feedback was also used to synthesise the development of an advanced scope of practice pathway to competency. Responses were received from all participating health-care networks. Five out of six sites successfully implemented an advanced practice role in g-tube management, with conservative health system savings estimated at $185 000. Ten dietitians were credentialed, with a further seven trainees in progress. Over 200 service events were recorded, including those diverted from other health professionals. Enabling factors for successful introduction included strong executive and stakeholder support, resources provided by grant funding, and established credentialing governance committees. Barriers included recruitment and governance processes. Opportunities exist for further expansion of advanced and extended practice roles for dietitians to meet future health-care demands.

Advanced practitioners are healthcare professionals that are highly skilled with a particular area of expertise. These roles have been successfully implemented in many healthcare settings, improving efficiency of the service, as well as enhancing the standard of care received by patients. Although advanced practice roles have been implemented in some radiation therapy departments, their implementation have yet to be facilitated in the majority of countries. The purpose of this review is to scope the literature available regarding established advanced practice roles in radiation therapy. The PRISMA strategy for the identification of relevant literature was adhered to. Two data bases, EMBASE and PubMed, were searched using combinations of the key words 'Advanced', 'Practice', 'APRT', 'Radiation', 'Therapy' and 'Radiotherapy'. Exclusion criteria were applied, and citation lists were also screened for additional relevant sources, including grey literature sources. A total of 35 relevant sources were identified that discussed advanced practice radiation therapy roles in the United Kingdom, Singapore, Canada, Australia and the USA. Means of role establishment and scope of practice were defined, and a number of advantages and challenges for advanced practice radiation therapist roles were identified. There are many benefits of implementing advanced practice roles in radiation therapy departments. Though the implementation of these roles can be challenging, the existing evidence indicates that it would be beneficial for the patient, the radiation therapist and the department as a whole. A more systematic approach, including reporting of quantitative outcomes may assist in the more widespread implementation of these roles.

IntroductionThe purpose of this study was to explore the factors influencing the implementation or the lack of implementation of advanced practitioner role in Australia.MethodsThis study uses an interpretative phenomenological approach to explore the in-depth real life issues, which surround the advanced practitioner as a solution to radiologist workforce shortages in Australia. Research participants are radiographers, radiation therapists and health managers registered with the Australian Institute of Radiography (AIR) and holding senior professional and AIR Board positions with knowledge of current advanced practice.ResultsIn total, seven interviews were conducted revealing education, governance, technical, people issues, change management, government, costs and timing as critical factors influencing advanced practice in Australia.ConclusionsSeven participants in this study perceived an advanced practice role might have major benefits and a positive impact on the immediate and long-term management of patients. Another finding is the greater respect and appreciation of each other's roles and expertise within the multidisciplinary healthcare team. Engagement is required of the critical stakeholders that have been identified as ‘blockers’ (radiologists, health departments) as well as identified allies (e.g. emergency clinicians, supportive radiologists, patient advocacy groups). The research supports that the AIR has a role to play for the professional identity of radiographers and shaping the advanced practice role in Australia.