Abstract
SYNOPSIS. A major theme of many papers in this symposium is the identification of broad physiological trends and patterns that extend beyond the boundaries of data from individual studies. Recognizing patterns in everything from hypoxic ventilatory patterns to regulation of blood gases not only helps the investigator understand specific data sets, but also helps place those data in a broad context. Yet, recognizing physiological patterns is confounded by two factors: phylogenetic relationships and physiological state. Fortunately, the last decade has seen infiltration of sound evolutionary theory, including tools of cladisitic analysis and population genetics, into more and more studies of comparative physiology. However, even when an experimenter carefully accounts for phytogeny, differences in physiological state in the experimental animals can still obscure physiological patterns. Two informal categories of physiological state are described, the first obvious and frequently controlled for, and the second less obvious and typically not controlled for. Examples of the latter, including seasons, rhythms, prandial effects and sex of the animal, are developed to show how ignoring these can lead to considerable misleading variation in cardiorespiratory data sets. Considering physiological state is vital in producing reliable data that can be used meaningfully for delineating broad physiological patterns.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.