Abstract

Sixty-five Hispanic students were referred for an evaluation to assess whether they qualified for placement in a program for gifted and accelerated students. All students were administered the WISC-R, OLSAT, CTBS (or the CAT), Culture Free SEI and the TDT. Results indicate that these subjects, as a group, scored higher on the individually administered WISC-R and that this test identified the highest proportion of students as accelerated and gifted students. The lowest scores were with the OLSAT and the reading achievement scores. Intermediate scores were with the language and math academic test scores along with the self-esteem and divergent thinking inventories. These discrepant test results are explained in terms of classroom curriculum, construct validity of the tests and issues surrounding individual vs. group test administration.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.