Abstract

The problem of the identification of acoustic sources has been widely treated in static or quasi-static source contexts, more recently for moving sources, in a wide range of applications. Different methods have been developed in this endeavor. In the context of identification of sources from a passing-by vehicle, the beamforming method is a reference that has well-known limitations: a poor resolution at low frequencies causes difficulties to discriminate close sources or with too different levels, and the convolution of the point spread function with the source-signal makes it difficult to evaluate the level precisely. Deconvolution methods are used to overcome those limitations. Mostly developed in static contexts at the beginning, extensions to moving sources have been proposed in the transportation field, mainly in air transportation and underwater acoustics. In the present investigation, these methods are numerically tested with parameters fitted to the road vehicle context. Their performance is assessed at different speeds, with varying additional noise levels. Beamforming—as the reference method—and several deconvolution methods (DAMAS, CLEAN, NNLS) extended to moving sources are compared using performance including: location of the maximum, source gravity center, maximum level and extended level. Illustrations involving an academic pendulum setup are given.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.