Meyna grisea (King & Gamble) Robyns and Meyna peltata Robyns (Rubiaceae: Vanguerieae) – a new record of two ethnobotanically significant fruit trees from Manipur, India

  • Abstract
  • Literature Map
  • Similar Papers
Abstract
Translate article icon Translate Article Star icon

Meyna grisea and M . peltata , two new records from Imphal Valley, Manipur, India, characterised by a capitate stigma with 4–5 divergent, spreading lobes on a globose base, and a prominent peltate stigma, respectively, are described and illustrated here. Photographs, key to the species, along with their coordinates and diagnostic characters in comparison with previously reported species from India, are provided.

Similar Papers
  • PDF Download Icon
  • Research Article
  • Cite Count Icon 2
  • 10.56369/tsaes.2349
ANÁLISIS MORFOANATOMÍCO FOLIAR EN GRUPOS HORTÍCOLAS DE AGUACATE (Persea americana) DEPOSITADOS EN LA COLECCIÓN DEL INIA-CENIAP, VENEZUELA
  • Aug 29, 2017
  • Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems
  • H Ferrer Pereira + 2 more

<p>The avocado (<em>Persea americana</em> Mill.) is the most important species of Lauraceae in America due to its exploitation as food for pre-Columbian and modern cultures. It is a very important seasonal crop in Venezuela based on a perennial fruit tree management. From a selection of 76 accessions (45 cultivars) of avocados cultivated at the Germplasm Bank of INIA-CENIAP, a morphoanatomical analysis was performed to identify attributes of taxonomic resolution (diagnostic characters) which allow to characterize sets and / or <em>culta</em>. Morphological study was carried out from each accession herborized sample. Information was obtained by freehand transverse leaf sections (epidermis, mesophyll and midvein) as well as paradermic preparations, and observed data was recorded in DELTA System. New morphoanatomical characters and discriminating attributes between cultivars were identified and described, especially to discriminate the Mexican group, and a close relationship within West Indian and Guatemalan cultivars was observed due to the variability identified from the latter group. Indument- related attributes were highly informative to discriminate among cultivars, along with the outline, apical angle and projections at the base of the leaf blades, stem cross section and presence of anise odor, progress and joining of the secondary nerve branches, tertiary venation pattern, abaxial contour and thickness of the sclerenchymatous sheath and compaction of the phloem in the vascular bundle, adaxial contour of the median nerve, and thickness, outline and uniformity of the anticlinal walls of adaxial and abaxial epidermal cells. </p>

  • Research Article
  • Cite Count Icon 1
  • 10.1002/tax.12402
(2788) Proposal to reject the name Radermachia rotunda (Artocarpus rotundus) (Moraceae)
  • Dec 1, 2020
  • TAXON
  • Elliot M Gardner + 1 more

(2788) Radermachia rotunda Houtt., Nat. Hist. 2(11): 455. 3 Dec 1779 [Angiosp.: Mor.], nom. utique rej. prop. Typus: non designatus. The name Artocarpus rigidus Blume (Bijdr. Fl. Ned. Ind.: 482. 1825, ‘rigida’) (Moraceae) has long been in near-exclusive use for a well-known species of wild fruit tree common throughout much of the Malesian region. It has become clear, however, that the earlier Artocarpus rotundus (Houtt.) Panzer (in Christmann, Vollst. Pflanzensyst. 10: 380. 1783, ‘rotunda’), based on Radermachia rotunda Houtt. (Nat. Hist. 2(11): 455. 1779), likely refers to the same species. To avoid confusion and taxonomic instability, we propose that the name Radermachia rotunda be rejected. No traceable original material exists for Radermachia rotunda, despite a recent search at G, where the main part of Houttuyn's herbarium resides (Wijnands & al. in Candollea 72: 155–198. 2017). The brief protologue provided the vernacular name “Mandelique” and three diagnostic characters: (1) the leaves are the same as those of Radermachia integra Thunb. (= Artocarpus integer (Thunb.) Merr.) but without roughness; (2) the pistillate inflorescences are completely round; and (3) the rough fruit grows to the size of a child's head. Artocarpus rigidus was validly published over 40 years later with a somewhat more detailed protologue and without mention of Artocarpus rotundus. The lectotype, without information on the collector, is preserved at Leiden (Java, barcode L 0039903). Merrill (in J. Arnold Arbor. 19: 331. 1938), in a paper on Houttuyn's names, concluded, based on the protologue, that Radermachia rotunda was the same species as Artocarpus rigidus, finding further confirmation in the vernacular name “mandeliké” associated by later authors with A. rigidus (Koorders & Valeton in Bijdr. Kennis Boomsorten Java 11: 19. 1906; also Hasskarl, Aanteek. Nut Java Pl.: 27. 1845; Teijsmann & Binnendijk, Cat. Hort. Bot. Bogor: 85. 1866). Merrill (l.c.) therefore reduced Artocarpus rigidus to synonymy under Artocarpus rotundus. In her monograph of Artocarpus, Jarrett (in J. Arnold Arbor. 40: 118, 153–154. 1959) disagreed and considered Radermachia rotunda Houtt. to be a nomen dubium, noting that although Mandelique was a common name for A. rigidus, the protologue was too vague because the leaves of that species are abaxially scabrid, and the infructescence is smaller than a child's head. She, therefore, maintained Artocarpus rigidus as the accepted name for the species. A more forgiving approach might note that although the leaves of Artocarpus rigidus are scabrid abaxially, they are usually (although not always) smooth adaxially, and that larger infructescences may at least attain the size of an infant's (if not a child's) head. Moreover, among the Javan species not separately dealt with by Houttuyn, Artocarpus rigidus is really the only good candidate for Radermachia rotunda. Artocarpus rotundus was apparently overlooked by early authors, perhaps, as Merrill speculated, because neither Houttuyn nor Panzer indicated their species as new. Blume's Artocarpus rigidus, on the other hand, was widely used and has appeared in all of the major treatments of Artocarpus over the past 170 years (Trécul in Ann. Sci. Nat., Bot., sér. 3, 8: 114. 1847; Miquel in Zollinger, Syst. Verz. 2: 89, 95. 1854–1855, Fl. Ned. Ind. 1: 286. 1859, Fl. Ned. Ind., Eerste Bijv.: 418. 1861, in Ann. Mus. Bot. Lugduno-Batavi 3: 211. 1867; King in Hooker, Fl. Brit. India 5: 540. 1888, in Ann. Roy. Bot. Gard. Calcutta 2: 8, t. 3. 1889; Ridley in J. Straits Branch Roy. Asiat. Soc. 33: 147. 1900, Fl. Malay Penins. 3: 352. 1924; Koorders & Valeton, l.c.: 17; Koorders, Exkurs.-Fl. Java 2: 93. 1912; Heyne, Nutt. Pl. Ned.-Ind.: 564. 1927; Burkill, Dict. Econ. Prod. Malay Penins.: 258. 1935; Corner, Wayside Trees Malaya: 657, t. 198, 199. 1940; Browne, Forest Trees Sarawak Brunei: 353. 1955; Jarrett, l.c.: 150; Kochummen, Tree Fl. Malaya 3: 131, t. 6. 1978, Tree Fl. Sabah Sarawak 3: 208, t. 5. 2000; Berg & al., Fl. Males., Ser. 1, 17(1): 100. 2006, Fl. Thailand 10(4): 17. 2011). By contrast, no modern treatments of Artocarpus have taken up Merrill's approach, and Artocarpus rotundus remains an obscure name that likely applies to a well-known species. Failure to reject Radermachia rotunda would uphold the principle of priority but would also promote nomenclatural instability and confusion. Because opinions have differed as to the application of the name, future authors who consider the protologue sufficient to equate the name with Artocarpus rigidus may feel compelled to follow Merrill and adopt A. rotundus, even while authors who agree with Jarrett continue to use A. rigidus. Rejecting Radermachia rotunda would eliminate that possibility and promote stability in the nomenclature of this species. The authors thank John McNeill for helpful consultation in preparing this proposal and Fred Stauffer for checking specimens at G. This research was supported by the US National Science Foundation (DBI 1711391) and the National Parks Board of Singapore.

  • Research Article
  • Cite Count Icon 79
  • 10.4039/entm9110fv
Larvae of the North American Olethreutidae (Lepidoptera)
  • Jan 1, 1959
  • Memoirs of the Entomological Society of Canada
  • Margaret Rae Mackay

The late-instar larvae of about 185 species of the North American Olethreutidae are described and most of them illustrated. Included in these are many pests, such as Grapholitha molesta, Carpocapsa pomonella, and Spilonota ocellana on fruit trees, Paralobesia viteana on grapes, Ancylis comptana fragariae on strawberries, Laspeyresia nigricana in pea pods, Laspeyresia caryana in hickory and pecan nuts, Taniva albolineana in spruce needles, and species of Rhyacionia and Petrova on pines. Keys to species groups and to individual species are provided. Of the diagnostic and specialized characters listed, the most useful include the setae, the spinneret, and the shape of the larva, especially of its head and anal shield. The main characters are given for the postulated ancestral larva and for the highly developed larva. Most of the species groups are arranged according to the suggested phylogenetic relationship of their larvae, emphasizing the necessity of a revision of the family. Larvae of some genera previously difficult to classify, such as Pseudogalleria and Hystricophora, indicate the relationship of those genera to other groups; conversely, lack of relationship is clearly shown in other instances, e.g., between Carpocapsa pomonella and Carpocapsa saltitans, and between the two species Epiblema culminana and E. suffusana and other members of the genus Epiblema.

Save Icon
Up Arrow
Open/Close
Notes

Save Important notes in documents

Highlight text to save as a note, or write notes directly

You can also access these Documents in Paperpal, our AI writing tool

Powered by our AI Writing Assistant