Human papilloma viruses and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: The role of colposcopy

Abstract

To evaluate the reliability of colposcopy for distinguishing flat condyloma from cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN), 211 patients with abnormal cytology, colposcopical evidence of an atypical transformation zone (ATZ), and a histological diagnosis of flat condyloma or CIN were studied. Colposcopic evidence of surface abnormalities, the presence of satellite lesions, and an irregular Lugol's uptake were tentatively considered to be features of condyloma. Histologically, koilocytotic lesions with a disorganized cytologically atypical basal/parabasal layer and with atypical mitotic figures (AMFs) were considered to be CIN cases, and designated as CIN with koilocytosis (CIN K). At least two colposcopic features of condyloma found in 98 of 99 flat condylomas, were also found in 89 of 112 CINs. When colposcopic features were matched with histology for every directed biopsy site, they correlated strongly with koilocytosis, regardless of the degree of atypia in the lesion. Moreover, these features often occurred at the periphery of poorly differentiated or undifferentiated, high grade CINs, in areas histologically indistinguishable from flat condyloma. Thus, colposcopic features are not of predictive value in distinguishing flat condyloma from CIN, do not show correspondence to the lesional degree of atypia and cannot be fully related to the biological characteristics of the cervices in which they are found. These findings confirm that colposcopy cannot be considered to be a diagnostic method.