Abstract

The objective of the article is to define rules for establishing a high quality costing system to measure the costs of products, customers, and other cost objects in a manufacturing enterprise. The pros and cons of all existing costing methods are discussed in the article, as are the methods themselves. Furthermore, their allocation principles are investigated, along with the nature of costs and the behavior of cost elements in major enterprises. One expectation is that different principles of cost allocation will have to be applied to different types of costs, based on their relation to the output of a company’s processes. Initially, several analyses are performed in order to identify the methods that prove insufficient for effective and accurate cost allocation. These methods, despite their inaccuracies, are very frequently used in practice. Also, cost elements or cost pools inside an organization, which tend to be hard to allocate accurately, are identified. Secondly, several implementation projects on the activity-based costing system, have been analyzed in order to consider the effectiveness of utilizing such a system in a manufacturing enterprise. Furthermore, the general rules for allocating cost pools or activity costs are outlined. Thirdly, different principles for cost allocation are defined for individual cost elements. The result of the article is to define the rules for implementing a costing system which provides accurate and correct information. These rules should provide for a compromise between the use of a traditional absorption costing system and the activity-based costing system, by pointing out the most important allocation principles.

Highlights

  • The difficulty inherent in choosing a proper and accurate product costing method for manufacturing enterprises has been widely discussed by academics and practitioners

  • Traditional costing techniques were used for the purposes of overhead cost allocation during the 20th century

  • The most important limitations of the variable costing method are defined (Král, 2006): The construction of the method restricts managers to formulating short-term decisions which could clash with strategic objectives of the enterprises in question; Because fixed costs are not calculated, they are eliminated from consideration; Due to the fact that fixed costs are summarised, the causal relations between costs and objects are lost

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The difficulty inherent in choosing a proper and accurate product costing method for manufacturing enterprises has been widely discussed by academics and practitioners. The variable costing method helps users avoid issues relating to imprecise overhead cost allocation, whilst calculating the capacity of the company by separately measuring the company’s fixed costs This method is unable to manage company’s overheads effectively and is insufficient when it comes to producing information on total product cost. Another method which potentially does away with inaccurate overhead cost allocation is activity-based costing (ABC). Utilization of the ABC system is hampered by a higher demand for nonfinancial information that has to be registered by the company, whilst being trickier to use and implement In some cases, it can provide very similar results to absorption costing. How should an industrial company set up an effective costing system for providing accurate data? These matters are going to be addressed in this paper

Costing systems and cost allocation principles
Major difference between real and allocated costs
Cost objects Customers Products
The cost structure of manufacturing enterprises
Product sustaining costs
Product unit cost
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.