Abstract
PurposeEvaluating sediment fingerprinting source apportionments with artificial mixtures is crucial for supporting decision-making and advancing modeling approaches. However, artificial mixtures are rarely incorporated into fingerprinting research and guidelines for model testing are currently lacking. Here, we demonstrate how to test source apportionments using laboratory and virtual mixtures by comparing the results from Bayesian and bootstrapped modeling approaches.Materials and methodsLaboratory and virtual mixtures (n = 79) with known source proportions were created with soil samples from two catchments in Fukushima Prefecture, Japan. Soil samples were sieved at 63 µm and analyzed for colorimetric and geochemical parameters. The MixSIAR Bayesian framework and a bootstrapped mixing model (BMM) were used to estimate source contributions to the artificial mixtures. In addition, we proposed and demonstrated the use of multiple evaluation metrics to report on model uncertainty, residual errors, performance, and contingency criteria.Results and discussionOverall, there were negligible differences between source apportionments for the laboratory and virtual mixtures, for both models. The comparison between MixSIAR and BMM illustrated a trade-off between accuracy and precision in the model results. The more certain MixSIAR solutions encompassed a lesser proportion of known source values, whereas the BMM apportionments were markedly less precise. Although model performance declined for mixtures with a single source contributing greater than 0.75 of the material, both models represented the general trends in the mixtures and identified their major sources.ConclusionsVirtual mixtures are as robust as laboratory mixtures for assessing fingerprinting mixing models if analytical errors are negligible. We therefore recommend to always include virtual mixtures as part of the model testing process. Additionally, we highlight the value of using evaluation metrics that consider the accuracy and precision of model results, and the importance of reporting uncertainty when modeling source apportionments.
Highlights
IntroductionThis approach capitalizes on differences in physical and biogeochemical parameters, or fingerprints, to model source contributions to target material
Sediment source fingerprinting is increasingly used to estimate sources of particulate material in riverine, lacustrine, and coastal systems (Jalowska et al 2017; Lavrieux et al.Responsible editor: Hugh Smith2019; Gibbs et al 2020)
We presented a comparison between laboratory and virtual mixtures used for evaluating sediment fingerprinting source apportionments
Summary
This approach capitalizes on differences in physical and biogeochemical parameters, or fingerprints, to model source contributions to target material. Mineral magnetic properties, color parameters, major and trace element geochemistry, and other fingerprints have all been used to apportion sources in end-member mixing models. Several reviews have been published that provide a thorough discussion of sediment source fingerprinting fundamentals (Walling 2005; Koiter et al 2013; Owens et al 2016) and its importance in integrated water resource management (Collins et al 2017; Owens 2020). Central to the confident apportionment of target material to their sources is the modeling process. In the 1980s, endmember mixing models were first introduced to solve simultaneous equations with mean values of selected source and
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
