Abstract
According to Schumpeter’s extraordinarily influential ‘realistic’ theory of representative democracy, democracy is essentially a method for vesting in certain individuals the power to make binding political. The essence of representative democracy is the ability of citizens to replace one government by another and, hence, to hold the political decision-makers accountable to them. For Schumpeter and his followers, it is not only natural, but also desirable that the role of the citizens in the political process be narrowly circumscribed. Therefore, the supporters of the ‘realist’ theory of democracy have always been highly sceptical about direct-democratic procedures. They simply do not believe that citizens are sufficiently qualified for direct participation in political decision-making. Citizens tend to be little interested in politics and badly informed about it. However, this does not mean that they are unable to make meaningful political decisions. I shall argue that citizens can make meaningful decision, because their choices are simplified and pre-structured by the institutional setting and by the heuristic cues and the arguments provided by the political elites.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.