Abstract

ObjectiveUsing claims data from an integrated payer–provider, we compared costs incurred by patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) who received Hospital Inpatient/Observation/EmeRgency Department care (HIghER care) for diabetes-related events with those who did not receive such care to identify a target population for interventions in future studies. MethodsA retrospective study pooled real-world claims data for IDDM (type 1 or type 2) between July 1, 2018, and June 30, 2019. Medical claims were used to calculate the total and diabetes-related allowed medical costs to the enterprise and per member per month costs. ResultsMedical and prescription drug coverage from 19 378 members was analyzed. Only 8.4% of the IDDM population received HIghER care but incurred 20% of medical expenses and nearly 40% of diabetes-related medical costs. For HIghER care patients, medical spending was higher in every inpatient and outpatient category (Wilcoxon 2-sample tests, all P < .0001). Non–diabetes-related prescription drug costs were greater in this group (Wilcoxon test, Z = 2.2879, P = .0221), whereas diabetes-related prescription drug costs were higher for non-HIghER care (Wilcoxon test, Z = −9.5918, P < .0001). In a longitudinal study of 29 602 patients over 24 months, previous-year receipt of HIghER care was a significant predictor of HIghER care the subsequent year (odds ratio, 3.28). ConclusionMedical spending for patients receiving HIghER care was disproportionately high and greater in every inpatient and outpatient category. HIghER care receipt the previous year was highly predictive of HIghER care episodes the following year.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.