Horizontally transferred NADAR genes contribute to immune defense of ladybird beetles against bacterial infection.

In the environment, unicellular organisms such as prokaryotes are exposed to direct invasion of viruses and its consequent transduction. In addition, some of the prokaryotic species can uptake naked DNA molecules outside or transfer their own DNA to other species through conjugative plasmids. Hence, prokaryotic genomes could be often mosaic: they may have the extrinsic genes which are not vertically transmitted from the ancestor but horizontally transferred from other organisms. Such a phenomenon, namely, “horizontal (or lateral) gene transfer,” is the main issue of this chapter. Horizontal gene transfer can rapidly cause genotypic/phenotypic changes in the recipient organisms, apparently beyond the theory of traditional population genetics based on mutation. Thus, it has been considered that horizontal gene transfer has influenced very much on the evolution of prokaryotes. In response to the accumulation of genomic data, the amount of horizontally transferred genes has been estimated at the large scale, but the significance of horizontal gene transfer in real environment has not been fully assessed. How often does horizontal gene transfer occur among taxa? How much does it affect the gene pool in environment? The challenging studies have just started. Metagenomic approaches have a great potential for this purpose, but many methodological limitations for treating the data remains unsolved. In this chapter, traditional genomics methods for estimating horizontally transferred genes are first reviewed. In the latter part, technical perspectives on prediction of horizontal gene transfer from the metagenomics data are discussed.

BackgroundHorizontal gene transfer, i.e. the acquisition of genetic material from nonparent organism, is considered an important force driving species evolution. Many cases of horizontal gene transfer from prokaryotes to eukaryotes have been registered, but no transfer mechanism has been deciphered so far, although viruses were proposed as possible vectors in several studies. In agreement with this idea, in our previous study we discovered that in two eukaryotic proteins bacteriophage recombination site (AttP) was adjacent to the regions originating via horizontal gene transfer. In one of those cases AttP site was present inside the introns of cysteine-rich repeats. In the present study we aimed to apply computational tools for finding multiple horizontal gene transfer events in large genome databases. For that purpose we used a sequence of cysteine-rich repeats to identify genes potentially acquired through horizontal transfer.ResultsHMMER remote similarity search significantly detected 382 proteins containing cysteine-rich repeats. All of them, except 8 sequences, belong to eukaryotes. In 124 proteins the presence of conserved structural domains was predicted. In spite of the fact that cysteine-rich repeats are found almost exclusively in eukaryotic proteins, many predicted domains are most common for prokaryotes or bacteriophages. Ninety-eight proteins out of 124 contain typical prokaryotic domains. In those cases proteins were considered as potentially originating via horizontal transfer. In addition, HHblits search revealed that two domains of the same fungal protein, Glycoside hydrolase and Peptidase M15, have high similarity with proteins of two different prokaryotic species, hinting at independent horizontal gene transfer events.ConclusionsCysteine-rich repeats in eukaryotic proteins are usually accompanied by conserved domains typical for prokaryotes or bacteriophages. These proteins, containing both cysteine-rich repeats, and characteristic prokaryotic domains, might represent multiple independent horizontal gene transfer events from prokaryotes to eukaryotes. We believe that the presence of bacteriophage recombination site inside cysteine-rich repeat coding sequence may facilitate horizontal genes transfer. Thus computational approach, described in the present study, can help finding multiple sequences originated from horizontal transfer in eukaryotic genomes.

Chapter 25 - Horizontal Gene Transfer and its Role in the Evolution of Prokaryotes

Most known examples of horizontal gene transfer (HGT) between eukaryotes are ancient. These events are identified primarily using phylogenetic methods on coding regions alone. Only rarely are there examples of HGT where noncoding DNA is also reported. The gene encoding the wheat virulence protein ToxA and the surrounding 14 kb is one of these rare examples. ToxA has been horizontally transferred between three fungal wheat pathogens (Parastagonospora nodorum, Pyrenophora tritici-repentis, and Bipolaris sorokiniana) as part of a conserved ∼14 kb element which contains coding and noncoding regions. Here we used long-read sequencing to define the extent of HGT between these three fungal species. Construction of near-chromosomal-level assemblies enabled identification of terminal inverted repeats on either end of the 14 kb region, typical of a type II DNA transposon. This is the first description of ToxA with complete transposon features, which we call ToxhAT. In all three species, ToxhAT resides in a large (140-to-250 kb) transposon-rich genomic island which is absent in isolates that do not carry the gene (annotated here as toxa- ). We demonstrate that the horizontal transfer of ToxhAT between P. tritici-repentis and P. nodorum occurred as part of a large (∼80 kb) HGT which is now undergoing extensive decay. In B. sorokiniana, in contrast, ToxhAT and its resident genomic island are mobile within the genome. Together, these data provide insight into the noncoding regions that facilitate HGT between eukaryotes and into the genomic processes which mask the extent of HGT between these species.IMPORTANCE This work dissects the tripartite horizontal transfer of ToxA, a gene that has a direct negative impact on global wheat yields. Defining the extent of horizontally transferred DNA is important because it can provide clues to the mechanisms that facilitate HGT. Our analysis of ToxA and its surrounding 14 kb suggests that this gene was horizontally transferred in two independent events, with one event likely facilitated by a type II DNA transposon. These horizontal transfer events are now in various processes of decay in each species due to the repeated insertion of new transposons and subsequent rounds of targeted mutation by a fungal genome defense mechanism known as repeat induced point mutation. This work highlights the role that HGT plays in the evolution of host adaptation in eukaryotic pathogens. It also increases the growing body of evidence indicating that transposons facilitate adaptive HGT events between fungi present in similar environments and hosts.

Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) acquires drug resistance at a rate comparable to that of bacterial pathogens that replicate much faster and have a higher mutation rate. One explanation for this rapid acquisition of drug resistance in Mtb is that drug resistance may evolve in other fast-replicating mycobacteria and then be transferred to Mtb through horizontal gene transfer (HGT). This paper aims to address three questions. First, does HGT occur between Mtb and other mycobacterial species? Second, what genes after HGT tend to survive in the recipient genome? Third, does HGT contribute to antibiotic resistance in Mtb? I present a conceptual framework for detecting HGT and analyze 39 ribosomal protein genes, 23S and 16S ribosomal RNA genes, as well as several genes targeted by antibiotics against Mtb, from 43 genomes representing all major groups within Mycobacterium. I also included mgtC and the insertion sequence IS6110 that were previously reported to be involved in HGT. The insertion sequence IS6110 shows clearly that the Mtb complex participates in HGT. However, the horizontal transferability of genes depends on gene function, as was previously hypothesized. HGT is not observed in functionally important genes such as ribosomal protein genes, rRNA genes, and other genes chosen as drug targets. This pattern can be explained by differential selection against functionally important and unimportant genes after HGT. Functionally unimportant genes such as IS6110 are not strongly selected against, so HGT events involving such genes are visible. For functionally important genes, a horizontally transferred diverged homologue from a different species may not work as well as the native counterpart, so the HGT event involving such genes is strongly selected against and eliminated, rendering them invisible to us. In short, while HGT involving the Mtb complex occurs, antibiotic resistance in the Mtb complex arose from mutations in those drug-targeted genes within the Mtb complex and was not gained through HGT.

The global spread of antibiotic resistance has posed a serious threat to public healthcare and undermined decades of progress made in the fight against bacterial infections. It has been demonstrated that the lack of novel effective antibiotics and rapid spread of antibiotic resistance genes via horizontal transfer in the ecosystem are mainly responsible for this crisis. Notably, plasmid-mediated horizontal transfer of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) is recognized as the most dominant dissemination pathway of ARGs in humans, animals and environmental settings. Antibiotic selective pressure has always been regarded as one of the crucial contributors to promoting the dissemination of antibiotic resistance through horizontal gene transfer (HGT). However, the roles of exogenous compounds and particularly non-antibiotic drugs in the spread of ARGs are still underappreciated. In this review, we first summarize the major pathways of HGT in bacteria, including conjugation, transformation, transduction and vesiduction. Subsequently, an overview of these compounds capable of promoting the HGT is presented, which guides to the formulation of more reasonable dosing regimens and drug residue standards in clinical practice. By contrast, these compounds that display an inhibition effect on HGT are also highlighted, which provides a unique strategy to minimize the spread of ARGs. Lastly, we discuss the implementations and challenges in bringing these HGT inhibitors into clinical trials.

Horizontal gene transfer is the gene exchange between different organisms or different organelles, which occurs frequently in prokaryotes. Many newly identified horizontal transfer events in eukaryotes indicates that it is a common phenomenon in all organisms. This paper describes the concept of horizontal gene transfer, the standard for judging a horizontal gene transfer events, the character, the mode, the way of horizontal gene transfer, and its impact on gene and genome evolution. The analyses of phylogenetic tree, base composition, selection pressure, intron sequence comparison, inserted special sequence, and biased nucleotide substitution are the most common methods used in previous researches. Evidence accumulated demonstrated that transposable sequences are most likely undergoing horizontal transferring. Transformation, conjugation, and transduction are the main forms of horizontal gene transfer in prokaryotes, but no clear clue was related with the mechanism of horizontal gene transfer in eukaryotes. Horizontal gene transfer plays a special role in genetic, genomic, and the biological evolution.

Prevalence of multi-resistant plasmids in hospital inhalable particulate matter (PM) and its impact on horizontal gene transfer.

To be horizontally transferred or not

BackgroundHorizontal gene transfer, the transfer and incorporation of genetic material between different species of organisms, has an important but poorly quantified role in the adaptation of microbes to their environment. Previous work has shown that genome size and the number of horizontally transferred genes are strongly correlated. Here we consider how genome size confuses the quantification of horizontal gene transfer because the number of genes an organism accumulates over time depends on its evolutionary history and ecological context (e.g., the nutrient regime for which it is adapted).ResultsWe investigated horizontal gene transfer between archaea and bacteria by first counting reciprocal BLAST hits among 448 bacterial and 57 archaeal genomes to find shared genes. Then we used the DarkHorse algorithm, a probability-based, lineage-weighted method (Podell & Gaasterland, 2007), to identify potential horizontally transferred genes among these shared genes. By removing the effect of genome size in the bacteria, we have identified bacteria with unusually large numbers of shared genes with archaea for their genome size. Interestingly, archaea and bacteria that live in anaerobic and/or high temperature conditions are more likely to share unusually large numbers of genes. However, high salt was not found to significantly affect the numbers of shared genes. Numbers of shared (genome size-corrected, reciprocal BLAST hits) and transferred genes (identified by DarkHorse) were strongly correlated. Thus archaea and bacteria that live in anaerobic and/or high temperature conditions are more likely to share horizontally transferred genes. These horizontally transferred genes are over-represented by genes involved in energy conversion as well as the transport and metabolism of inorganic ions and amino acids.ConclusionsAnaerobic and thermophilic bacteria share unusually large numbers of genes with archaea. This is mainly due to horizontal gene transfer of genes from the archaea to the bacteria. In general, these transfers are from archaea that live in similar oxygen and temperature conditions as the bacteria that receive the genes. Potential hotspots of horizontal gene transfer between archaea and bacteria include hot springs, marine sediments, and oil wells. Cold spots for horizontal transfer included dilute, aerobic, mesophilic environments such as marine and freshwater surface waters.

Porphyromonas gingivalis is one of the major bacteria that causes periodontitis. Chronic periodontitis is a severe form of periodontal disease that ultimately leads to tooth loss. Virulence factors that contribute to periodontitis are secreted by Type IX Secretion System (T9SS). There are aspects of T9SS protein components that have yet to be characterised. Thus, the aim of this study is to investigate the phylogenetic relationship between members of 20 T9SS component protein families. The Bayesian Inference (BI) trees for 19 T9SS protein components exhibit monophyletic clades for all major classes under Bacteroidetes with strong support for the monophyletic clades or its subclades that is consistent with phylogeny exhibited by the constructed BI tree of 16S rRNA. The BI tree of PorR is different from the 19 BI trees of T9SS protein components as it does not exhibit monophyletic clades for all major classes under Bacteroidetes. There is strong support for the phylogeny exhibited by the BI tree of PorR which deviates from the phylogeny based on 16S rRNA. Hence, it is possible that the porR gene is subjected to horizontal transfer as it is known that virulence factor genes could be horizontally transferred. Seven genes (porR included) that are involved in the biosynthesis of A-LPS are found to be flanked by insertion sequences (IS5 family transposons). Therefore, the intervening DNA segment that contains the porR gene might be transposed and subjected to conjugative transfer. Thus, the seven genes can be co-transferred via horizontal gene transfer. The BI tree of UgdA does not exhibit monophyletic clades for all major classes under Bacteroidetes which is similar to the BI tree of PorR (both are a part of the seven genes). Both BI trees also exhibit similar topology as the four identified clusters with strong support and have similar relative positions to each other in both BI trees. This reinforces the possibility that porR and the other six genes might be horizontally transferred. Other than the BI tree of PorR, the 19 other BI trees of T9SS protein components also exhibit evidence of horizontal gene transfer. However, their genes might undergo horizontal gene transfer less frequently compared to porR because the intervening DNA segment that contains porR is easily exchanged between bacteria under Bacteroidetes due to the presence of insertion sequences (IS5 family transposons) that flank it. In conclusion, this study can provide a better understanding about the phylogeny of T9SS protein components.

Molecular biologists have long used viruses, plasmids, transposons, and other “vectors” as tools to directly manipulate the genetic makeup of experimental organisms. In nature, these tool vectors originated in species, usually bacteria, as facilitators of horizontal (also known as lateral) gene transfer (HGT). In contrast to vertical inheritance, where the transmission of genetic material occurs vertically from parent to offspring, HGT refers to the horizontal exchange of genes between distantly related strains and species. As described in this volume, there are many examples of HGT between species of bacteria, such as that mediated by plasmids and phages, which bear genes responsible for pathogenicity and antibiotic resistance. HGT is also known to occur in eukaryotes; for example, DNA transposons have been suggested as being horizontally transferred between different species of the fruitfly Drosophila (Bushman, 2002). These are examples of HGT on a relatively recent evolutionary timescale. However, HGT might have had a pivotal evolutionary role in more ancient times. Comparative analyses of molecular data that are exploding from genome sequencing projects indicates that HGT might have been the main driving force behind the evolution of cellular life (Brown, 2003). The reason for believing the occurrence of ancient HGT is relatively simple. In an evolutionary context, genes are not found where they are expected to be. The most fundamental subdivisions of living organisms are the three urkingdoms or domains of life: the Archea (traditionally called “archaebacteria”), Bacteria (traditionally called “eubacteria”), and Eucarya (interchangeable here and elsewhere with the term “eukaryote”; Woese, Kandler, and Wheelis, 1990).

In contrast to vertical gene transfer from parent to offspring, horizontal (or lateral) gene transfer moves genetic information between different species. Bacteria and archaea often adapt through horizontal gene transfer. Recent analyses indicate that eukaryotic genomes, too, have acquired numerous genes via horizontal transfer from prokaryotes and other lineages. Based on this we raise the hypothesis that horizontally acquired genes may have contributed more to adaptive evolution of eukaryotes than previously assumed. Current candidate sets of horizontally acquired eukaryotic genes may just be the tip of an iceberg. We have recently shown that adaptation of the thermoacidophilic red alga Galdieria sulphuraria to its hot, acid, toxic-metal laden, volcanic environment was facilitated by the acquisition of numerous genes from extremophile bacteria and archaea. Other recently published examples of horizontal acquisitions involved in adaptation include ice-binding proteins in marine algae, enzymes for carotenoid biosynthesis in aphids, and genes involved in fungal metabolism. Editor's suggested further reading in BioEssays Jumping the fine LINE between species: Horizontal transfer of transposable elements in animals catalyses genome evolutionAbstract.

BackgroundComparative analysis of sequenced genomes reveals numerous instances of apparent horizontal gene transfer (HGT), at least in prokaryotes, and indicates that lineage-specific gene loss might have been even more common in evolution. This complicates the notion of a species tree, which needs to be re-interpreted as a prevailing evolutionary trend, rather than the full depiction of evolution, and makes reconstruction of ancestral genomes a non-trivial task.ResultsWe addressed the problem of constructing parsimonious scenarios for individual sets of orthologous genes given a species tree. The orthologous sets were taken from the database of Clusters of Orthologous Groups of proteins (COGs). We show that the phyletic patterns (patterns of presence-absence in completely sequenced genomes) of almost 90% of the COGs are inconsistent with the hypothetical species tree. Algorithms were developed to reconcile the phyletic patterns with the species tree by postulating gene loss, COG emergence and HGT (the latter two classes of events were collectively treated as gene gains). We prove that each of these algorithms produces a parsimonious evolutionary scenario, which can be represented as mapping of loss and gain events on the species tree. The distribution of the evolutionary events among the tree nodes substantially depends on the underlying assumptions of the reconciliation algorithm, e.g. whether or not independent gene gains (gain after loss after gain) are permitted. Biological considerations suggest that, on average, gene loss might be a more likely event than gene gain. Therefore different gain penalties were used and the resulting series of reconstructed gene sets for the last universal common ancestor (LUCA) of the extant life forms were analysed. The number of genes in the reconstructed LUCA gene sets grows as the gain penalty increases. However, qualitative examination of the LUCA versions reconstructed with different gain penalties indicates that, even with a gain penalty of 1 (equal weights assigned to a gain and a loss), the set of 572 genes assigned to LUCA might be nearly sufficient to sustain a functioning organism. Under this gain penalty value, the numbers of horizontal gene transfer and gene loss events are nearly identical. This result holds true for two alternative topologies of the species tree and even under random shuffling of the tree. Therefore, the results seem to be compatible with approximately equal likelihoods of HGT and gene loss in the evolution of prokaryotes.ConclusionsThe notion that gene loss and HGT are major aspects of prokaryotic evolution was supported by quantitative analysis of the mapping of the phyletic patterns of COGs onto a hypothetical species tree. Algorithms were developed for constructing parsimonious evolutionary scenarios, which include gene loss and gain events, for orthologous gene sets, given a species tree. This analysis shows, contrary to expectations, that the number of predicted HGT events that occurred during the evolution of prokaryotes might be approximately the same as the number of gene losses. The approach to the reconstruction of evolutionary scenarios employed here is conservative with regard to the detection of HGT because only patterns of gene presence-absence in sequenced genomes are taken into account. In reality, horizontal transfer might have contributed to the evolution of many other genes also, which makes it a dominant force in prokaryotic evolution.

The formation mechanism of operons remains unresolved: operons may form by rearrangements within a genome or by acquisition of genes from other species, that is, horizontal gene transfer (HGT). One hindrance to its elucidation is the unavailability of a method to accurately identify HGT, although it is generally considered to occur. It is critically important first to select horizontally transferred (HT) genes reliably and then to determine the extent to which HGT is involved in operon formation. For this purpose, we considered indels in terms of gene clusters instead of individual genes and chose candidates of HT genes in 8 species of Escherichia, Shigella, and Salmonella based on the minimization of indels. To select a benchmark set of positively HT genes against which we can evaluate the candidate set, we devised another procedure using intergenetic alignments. Comparison with the benchmark set demonstrated the absence of a significant number of false positives in the candidate set, showing the high reliability of the method. Analyses of Escherichia coli K-12 operons revealed that although approximately 20 operons were probably gained from the last common ancestor of the 8 gamma-proteobacteria, deletion of intervening genes accounts for the formation of no operons, whereas horizontal transfer expanded 2 operons and introduced 4 entire operons. Based on these observations and reasoning, we suggest that the main mechanism of operon gain is HGT rather than intragenomic rearrangements. We propose that genes with related essential functions tend to reside in conserved operons, whereas genes in nonconserved operons mostly confer slight advantage to the organisms and frequently undergo horizontal transfer and decay. HT genes constitute at least 5.5% of the genes in the 8 species and approximately 45% of which originate from other gamma-proteobacteria. Genes involved in viral functions and mobile and extrachromosomal element functions are HT more often than expected. This finding indicates frequent mediation of HGT by bacteriophages. On the other hand, not only informational genes (those involved in transcription, translation, and related processes) but also operational genes (those involved in housekeeping) are HT less frequently than expected.