Horizontal ecological compensation standards based on ecosystem services flow
Horizontal ecological compensation standards based on ecosystem services flow
- Research Article
3
- 10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.140612
- Jan 1, 2024
- Journal of Cleaner Production
Resources time footprint for assessment of human influence on ecosystem service from a sustainability standpoint
- Research Article
11
- 10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112510
- Aug 24, 2024
- Ecological Indicators
Exploring ecological compensation standards in the urbanization process: An ecosystem service value-based perspective
- Research Article
58
- 10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.105995
- Jan 25, 2022
- Land Use Policy
Quantification of the coupling relationship between ecological compensation and ecosystem services in the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China
- Research Article
1
- 10.3389/feart.2024.1432037
- Oct 2, 2024
- Frontiers in Earth Science
Ecosystems supply goods and services to humans and are the basis for sustainable development of human society. The study of the supply of ecosystem services and the demand and consumption of ecosystem services by human society, and the analysis of the supply and demand characteristics and flow relationships of ecosystem service flows are of great significance for the management of regional ecosystems and the development of ecological compensation. Taking the Yangtze River Economic Belt as an example, this paper calculates the supply and demand indices of ecosystem services in 2015 and 2020, and determines the ecosystem spatial flow paths and flow volumes from the ecosystem supply area to the demand area based on various methods and models such as the minimum cumulative resistance (MCR) model and distance decay model. The results indicate that 1). In 2015 and 2020, the supply and demand of ecosystem services in the Yangtze River Economic Zone show an increasing trend numerically, and there is spatial heterogeneity in the spatial distribution. In terms of ecosystem service supply per unit area, the midstream region is higher than the upstream and downstream regions. In terms of the demand for ecosystem services per unit area, the downstream is higher than the midstream and upstream. 2). From the supply-demand balance of ecosystem services in the Yangtze River Economic Zone, the midstream region is mainly the area of surplus supply of ecosystem services, and the downstream region is mainly the area of deficit supply. From 2015 to 2020, the number of areas with balanced supply and demand of ecosystem services in the Yangtze River Economic Belt decreases and the number of areas with unbalanced supply and demand increases, which is related to the changes in the level of economic development and land use patterns. 3). The flow of ecosystem services in the Yangtze River Economic Belt shows an increasing trend, from 726.59 billion yuan in 2015 to 1,450.54 billion yuan in 2020, with Jiangxi Province being the main ecosystem service supply area and Zhejiang Province being the main ecosystem service demand area in the Yangtze River Economic Belt.
- Research Article
4
- 10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.143648
- Sep 16, 2024
- Journal of Cleaner Production
Multi-scale matching and simulating flows of ecosystem service supply and demand in the Wuhan metropolitan area, China
- Research Article
50
- 10.1016/j.oneear.2020.11.003
- Dec 1, 2020
- One Earth
Ecosystem services at risk: integrating spatiotemporal dynamics of supply and demand to promote long-term provision
- Research Article
28
- 10.1002/pan3.10298
- Jan 10, 2022
- People and Nature
Quantifying and mapping trans‐boundary ecosystem service (ES) flows can help identify dependencies and responsibilities for promoting economic development and environmental sustainability between nations, but few studies have focused on ES flows beyond national boundaries. Our case‐study region—Central Asia—hosts one of the largest dryland areas in the world, and this ecosystem is vulnerable to climate variability and anthropogenic impacts. Understanding ES supply, demand and flows is essential for supporting human wellbeing, livelihoods and economic development. In this study, we mapped the supply, demand and flows of four ES including freshwater provision, food provision, carbon sequestration and cultural (recreation) services between the five Central Asian nations of Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan and Turkmenistan for the year 2016. We quantified the spatial patterns in ES supply and demand at local and regional scales, driven by environmental heterogeneity and socio‐economic development, and revealed complex telecoupling of ES flows between nations. Kazakhstan provided the greatest amount of ES to other countries, especially food provision and carbon sequestration, while Uzbekistan was the biggest ES beneficiary, especially from freshwater and food provision services. Our analysis of trans‐boundary ES flows helps to understand the complex telecoupling and rich interdependencies between people and nature between different countries. This information is essential for policy making to balance human and ecological needs, enhance the management of natural capital, and sustain ES provision in our metacoupled world. A free Plain Language Summary can be found within the Supporting Information of this article.
- Research Article
2
- 10.1007/s11356-024-32904-y
- Mar 22, 2024
- Environmental Science and Pollution Research
Accurate assessment of ecosystem service (ES) supply, demand, and flow is essential for identifying and enhancing the ES supply-demand relationship and promoting regional sustainable development. Based on the InVEST model, supply-demand ratio, coupling coordination analysis, breakpoint and field strength model, and GIS spatial analysis method, we evaluated the supply and demand of water yield, food supply, carbon storage, and soil conservation service in the Loess Plateau in 2000 and 2020 and analyzed the supply-demand relationship before and after considering the interregional ecosystem service flow (ESF). The results showed that (1) from 2000 to 2020, the supply and demand of the four types of ESs in the Loess Plateau increased. Before considering ESF, the surplus degree in water yield, food supply, and soil conservation increased, and carbon storage decreased. In most counties, the coupling coordination between the supply and demand of the soil conservation is mostly extreme incoordination and moderate incoordination, and other types of ESs are mostly reluctant coordination and moderate incoordination. The degree of incoordination in water yield and soil conservation have eased, while food supply and carbon storage have strengthened. For the comprehensive supply-demand relationship of ES, the degree of surplus and coordination increased, with most counties were in a state of surplus and coordination. (2) Water yield and soil conservation services flow primarily to the western and northwestern portions of the Loess Plateau, with a decrease in the number of flow paths but an increase in the total flow rate for the former and a decrease in flow paths and total flow rate for the latter. The food supply and carbon storage flow in all directions and the total flow rate increases, with a significant increase in the number of flow paths for carbon storage. (3) After considering ESF, the supply-demand relationship of each type of ES and the comprehensive ES supply-demand relationship are changed, in which the degree of surplus and coordination of deficit counties are significantly improved, and some counties even become surplus or improve the level of coordination. After considering ESF, the supply-demand ratio changes even more relative to the degree of coupling coordination. This study is of great significance for identifying the cross-regional transfer pattern of ES, understanding in-depth the dynamic supply-demand relationship of ES, and mitigating the mismatch between supply and demand of ES. It provides a scientific and objective theoretical basis for promoting regional sustainable development.
- Research Article
157
- 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106418
- Apr 28, 2020
- Ecological Indicators
Identification of ecosystem services supply and demand areas and simulation of ecosystem service flows in Shanghai
- Research Article
39
- 10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110687
- Aug 10, 2023
- Ecological Indicators
Research on ecological compensation based on the supply and demand of ecosystem services in the Qinling-Daba Mountains
- Research Article
119
- 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103341
- Dec 1, 2021
- Sustainable Cities and Society
How to optimize ecological compensation to alleviate environmental injustice in different cities in the Yellow River Basin? A case of integrating ecosystem service supply, demand and flow
- Research Article
99
- 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.08.025
- Mar 17, 2018
- Land Use Policy
Distinguishing between the ecosystems’ capacity to generate ecosystem services (ES) and the actual use of these service (ES flow) in ES assessment and mapping is important to develop an understanding of the sustainability of ES use. This study assesses the spatial variation in ES capacity and flow in the Mediterranean small island state of Malta. The services included in this study were crop provisioning, beekeeping and honey production, fodder and livestock production, crop pollination, air quality regulation, and aesthetic ES. This assessment develops different spatial models, which make use of available datasets, causal relationships between datasets, including a generated land use land cover (LULC) map, and statistical models and indicators based on direct measurements. Individual ES indicators were mapped to visualise and compare their spatial patterns across the case study area. Subsequently, an analysis of ES associations and bundles was carried out using Pearson parametric correlation test, for both ES capacity and flow indicators generated from this study, and through Principal Component Analysis. Results demonstrate several significant synergistic interactions between ES capacity and flow in rural landscapes characterised with agricultural and semi-natural LULC categories, indicating high landscape multifunctionality. In contrast, predominantly urban areas tend to be characterised with a low ecosystem capacity and ES flow, suggesting that ES delivery in the landscapes of the study area is determined by land use intensity. These findings support the notion that multifunctional rural landscapes provide multiple ES, making an important contribution to human well-being, and that land use planning that develops green infrastructure in urban areas can significantly contribute to support biodiversity and ES delivery.
- Research Article
40
- 10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110303
- May 4, 2023
- Ecological Indicators
Understanding ecosystem service flows through the metacoupling framework
- Research Article
26
- 10.1016/j.apgeog.2023.103150
- Nov 25, 2023
- Applied Geography
Evaluation of ecosystem services budget based on ecosystem services flow: A case study of Hangzhou Bay area
- Research Article
13
- 10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.111124
- Oct 27, 2023
- Ecological Indicators
Linking ecological and social systems to promote regional security management: A perspective of ecosystem services supply-flow-demand
- Ask R Discovery
- Chat PDF
AI summaries and top papers from 250M+ research sources.