Abstract

The object of this paper is to analyze the ideas and criteria on which the status hierarchy among South Asian Muslims is founded. This question is a hotly debated one in Western acade mic circles as well as among Muslims themselves. Both tend, for ideological reasons, to build sharply contrasted models: equalita rian Islam opposed to hierarchical Hinduism. The contention of this paper is that both Muslim and Hindu society share basic pre conceptions about social hierarchy; it is erroneous and misleading to contrast them on this point. It is more rewarding to start from this basic homology in the social structure, and then to search for differences; such differences are to be found only at the top of the social hierarchy. As a consequence there is no reason to avoid the word «caste»: the Muslim society appears as a truncated caste system. The ethnographic material used in this paper is reinterpre ted in the light of medieval jurisprudence and of its reformula tions by modern reformers; it is contented that the medieval view of a hierarchical society has not been seriously challenged to this day.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.